1st Round – Virtual Technical Test: The initial technical round was conducted virtually with the camera on. It included questions on SQL, Python, Power BI, and Excel Macros. However, many questions appeared to be taken directly from the internet and lacked coherence. Several questions couldn't be answered due to missing columns or datasets, which suggests the test may not have been reviewed by someone with a technical background. Despite this, I managed to complete the 3-hour test and moved to the next round. 2nd Round – Face-to-Face (HR Discussion): The second round, which was expected to be technical, turned out to be an HR interaction. The HR representative outlined the job responsibilities—emphasizing the need for a versatile data analyst to work across multiple domains and report directly to the MD. Initially, the role was presented as a 5-day workweek, but during this round, I was informed that Saturdays would be work-from-home. I was told this would be documented officially, which I appreciated, and agreed to proceed. 3rd Round – Final Round with MD: In the final round, I was interviewed by the MD. The conversation began with standard questions about my background and approach to data analysis, which I answered confidently. However, when I mentioned my academic background in mechanical engineering (despite having 4 years of experience in data analytics), the MD abruptly paused the interview, asked me to wait outside, and called in the HR team. What followed was a loud and uncomfortable confrontation between the MD and HR, visible to me as a candidate. I was then told they would get back to me. Takeaway: While the role sounded promising in terms of responsibility and exposure, I was disappointed to witness internal communication issues and a possible bias toward educational backgrounds over practical experience. Professionalism, especially during interviews, reflects an organization’s culture. While I appreciate the opportunity and effort of the HR team, the final interaction raised concerns about respect and transparency within the leadership. Advice to Candidates: Be prepared for a long and somewhat inconsistent process. Clarify work schedule expectations early. Know that practical skills may not always outweigh academic qualifications in their selection process.