I interviewed for a product manager position here about six years ago. The interview included some Google-esque mathematical logic questions that I wasn’t very good at solving on the spot. I felt that they weren’t very indicative of success in the position, and I ended up at a smaller company where I ended up in a C-level role and have ideated/designed several successful eCommerce and SAAS products. I don’t knock the interviewer because it’s extremely hard to vet candidates and my background would’ve made me a gamble. However, I did think that the mathematical logic question was a bit absurd as far as asking it on the spot.

1. Case study before any call (waste of time they don't even go over it with you, just to see if you have any idea how product management works I suppose) 2. Call with someone on the team asking about a product you use and how you would improve it w/ bunch of product questions 3. Another panel interview w/ more members of the team on a case study (no prep) and how to use APIs to build the case (don't understand why as a product lead I have to tell the developers what parameters an API can take in and output) 4. Another call with Director of PM; enjoyed this call another case study/brain teaser questions 5. Call with VP cultural fit As you can see, multiple rounds and multiple case studies for a company that sells stamps and online postage. My interviews at other FAANG companies were less work than this.