It was your run-of-the mill interview that sought out answers to the basics like your work experience and your background. However, I noticed that they dwelled a lot on educational background, but that may be because I was still a relatively fresh graduate when I applied.

It is a one day on-site application. I waited 4 hours for 2 interviews. The job description published online does not contain all the necessary details. It says that content writers have a 10 am - 7 pm schedule with adherance to regular weekends and holidays off, but I only discovered from the first interview that applicants must be open to mid shift, night shift, and shifts during weekends and holidays. The job description also failed to take note that applicants must be open to seeing explicit images and videos. It is a very essential quality for the role, yet I do not understand why it is not stated online. It can take time and money to visit this branch, so applicants should be given a full view of the role beforehand. Also, the interviewer in the second interview disqualified me from the role merely because Telus is not my number one choice among the companies I have pending applications with. He asked me how many pending applications I have and where I will rank Telus. I answered that Telus is just as equal as the other three companies I am interviewing for. I am the type of person who will not give actual rankings until I receive a contract about the finalized details. Apparently, that answer gave a "negative impression" about me, which I find very harsh and confusing coming from a company that is not very clear about the role online. He was also very busy with his phone, while I was answering his questions. I know that he was handling plenty of applicants at that time, but his behavior was quite distracting and unprofessional. I heard a lot of great things about Telus, but I am just disappointed about my experience.