I am writing this review to share my unfortunate experience working as an Ad Reviewer for Telus. It has been a disheartening journey that compelled me to take legal action against the company. At the interview process with Telus for an Ad Reviewer position, I was tasked with handling approximately 100 cases. While I understand that the nature of the role involves a significant workload, what became apparent over time was the imbalance between the amount of work assigned and the compensation provided. The workload was not only overwhelming but also seemed disproportionate to the compensation offered (none). It felt as though Telus was charging clients for the extensive ad review work while undervaluing and underpaying the employees responsible for carrying out these tasks. This disparity left me feeling exploited and frustrated. Despite putting in my best effort to meet the demands of the job, the lack of fair compensation became a glaring issue.I am writing to express my concerns and disappointment regarding my trial experience as an Ad Reviewer with Telus. During the trial period, I was assigned the task of handling approximately 100 cases, which, in retrospect, appeared to be an excessive and exploitative workload. My primary grievance stems from the fact that this trial, under the guise of assessing my capabilities, involved an unreasonably high volume of work. It became evident that the workload was far beyond the scope of a standard trial period, and the compensation, in this case, was nonexistent. The issue at hand is not merely about the volume of work but the apparent lack of acknowledgment or compensation for the time and effort invested. It felt as though Telus was obtaining substantial work output under the guise of a trial without offering fair compensation or formal employment. The implications of such a practice are concerning, and as a result, I am left with no choice but to pursue legal action against Telus. This decision is not taken lightly, but it is motivated by a commitment to fair labor practices and a belief that individuals, even during trial periods, should be treated with transparency and respect. I hope this review serves as a cautionary message for others considering trial opportunities at Telus. It is crucial to be aware of the expectations set during a trial period and to ensure that they align with reasonable industry standards. In conclusion, my trial experience as an Ad Reviewer at Telus has left me disheartened, and I feel compelled to take legal action to address the issues of unfair workload and the lack of compensation during this period. I encourage others who may have faced similar circumstances to advocate for their rights and seek a fair resolution.