Extremely long and arduous process with 2 screenings and 3 technical interviews. During this process, they use the typical FAANG leetcode/no realistic code example style of interviewing. The culture they described seemed overly daunting for whatever compensation benefits may have partially made up for it.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
How could a given page be broken down into components?
Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un selezionatore. La procedura ha richiesto 6 settimane. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Tanium (Raleigh, NC) nel mese di mar 2025
Colloquio
1 Phone Call (30 min) -> 1 Behavioral (30 min) -> 2 Technical Interviews (1 hour each) -> Requested for a 3rd Technical Interview (1 hour) -> Rejected
Entire process took 6 weeks, waaay too long in my opinion for what could've been 1-2 weeks. Also, I was told by all 3 interviewers my solutions were correct, but according to the rejection email, I was not chosen in favor of other candidates.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
1) Leetcode 1306 - Jump Game III (1 hour)
2) Implement Left Outer Join in Code (your language of choice) (1 hour)
3) Return smallest number from list of nums after flipping their digits
Ex: [12, 13, 91] returns 91 because 19 < 21 < 31
Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un'agenzia di reclutamento personale. La procedura ha richiesto 4 settimane. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Tanium (Raleigh, NC) nel mese di ago 2021
Colloquio
A couple recruiter rounds, two technical screens, and two more behavioral interviews. Most interviews showed up a few minutes late and mentioned that they were got caught up with work and missed the start/bottom of the hour.
Interviewers were disinterested and didnt review my resume until the interview itself (this was evident based on the questions they asked).
The recruiter never provided feedback after the final interviews, which seems extremely unprofessional.
