Passa al contenutoPassa al piè di pagina
  • Lavori
  • Aziende
  • Stipendi
  • Per le aziende

      Migliora la tua carriera

      Scopri le tue potenzialità di guadagno, trova lavori da sogno e condividi approfondimenti su lavoro e vita privata in forma anonima.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Target

      Azienda coinvolta

      Circa
      Recensioni
      Stipendi e benefit
      Lavori
      Colloqui
      Colloqui
      Ricerche correlate: Recensioni su Target | Offerte di lavoro di Target | Stipendi di Target | Benefit di Target
      Colloqui di TargetColloqui per Operations Research Analyst presso TargetColloquio di Target


      Glassdoor

      • Chi siamo
      • Contattaci

      Aziende

      • Account Business gratuito
      • Spazio per le aziende
      • Blog per le aziende

      Informazioni

      • Aiuto
      • Linee guida
      • Condizioni d'uso
      • Privacy e scelte pubblicitarie
      • Non vendere né condividere le mie informazioni
      • Strumento per l'accettazione dei cookie

      Lavora con noi

      • Inserzionisti
      • Carriere
      Scarica l'app

      • Cerca:
      • Aziende
      • Lavori
      • Località

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. "Glassdoor," "Worklife Pro," "Bowls" e il relativo logo sono marchi registrati di Glassdoor LLC.

      Aziende seguite

      Non lasciarti sfuggire opportunità e informazioni privilegiate seguendo le aziende dove vorresti lavorare.

      Ricerche di lavoro

      Ricevi suggerimenti e aggiornamenti personalizzati avviando le tue ricerche.

      Colloquio per Operations Research Analyst

      10 ago 2020
      Candidato anonimo a colloquio
      Minneapolis, MN
      Nessuna offerta
      Esperienza negativa

      Candidatura

      Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un selezionatore. La procedura ha richiesto 4 settimane. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Target (Minneapolis, MN) nel mese di lug 2020

      Colloquio

      After the recruiter emailed me if I'm interested in the role, we had a short call. He explained the location is in Minneapolis and gave some overview of the team. Fast forward to the screening call, two individuals called and ask me some generic technical questions. Then they scheduled four sessions for the interviews: Round 1) I met with a analyst from the team and he asked the SQL query question. He was clearly copy/pasting and reading off leetcode because he not properly explaining the question. Then he asked some overall questions about duality theorem but was not taking note on my performance. Round 2) I met with a manager who was supervising the role. We had some generic chat about supply chain but nothing technical. Round 3) I met with another manager, and we went over my resume. Again nothing technical, I felt they just want to get a sense of your personality at that point. Round 4) I met with another manager but this round was interesting. He joined the call about 5 minutes late. Then he started to brag about his managerial experience and how he identified the need to form a group of world-class operations researchers there. Then he bragged about Target being a fortune 50 companies. Then he threatened that if you're looking for an easy going job where you get off at 5 pm this is not for you. The whole conversation had a negative tone which I did not like. After the interview sessions I knew that is not a healthy environment to work. So I was not following up with the recruiter but during the three weeks after, he was sending me emails that we are interviewing more people and you're among the top candidates. Eventually, he called and let me know the team chose someone with more industry experience.

      Domande di colloquio [1]

      Domanda 1

      Write a SQL query to rank scores. If there is a tie between two scores, both should have the same ranking. Note that after a tie, the next ranking number should be the next consecutive integer value. In other words, there should be no "holes" between ranks. +----+-------+ | Id | Score | +----+-------+ | 1 | 3.50 | | 2 | 3.65 | | 3 | 4.00 | | 4 | 3.85 | | 5 | 4.00 | | 6 | 3.65 | +----+-------+ For example, given the above Scores table, your query should generate the following report (order by highest score): +-------+---------+ | score | Rank | +-------+---------+ | 4.00 | 1 | | 4.00 | 1 | | 3.85 | 2 | | 3.65 | 3 | | 3.65 | 3 | | 3.50 | 4 | +-------+---------+
      Rispondi alla domanda