Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un'altra fonte. La procedura ha richiesto una settimana. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Technion nel mese di feb 2011
Ho presentato la mia candidatura di persona. La procedura ha richiesto 2 settimane. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Technion (Haifa)
Colloquio
You should approach the professors directly over email along with your CV, a motivation and relevant documents. More likely than not, they respond promptly in case they find you an appropriate match to their work. The interview takes place in a few rounds spanning over 2-3 weeks. The preliminary interview is a basic 'get to know you' kinda interview. The senior scientist will then ask for your referees to recommend you in her email. A technical interview round then follows based on your research area (for example presenting/discussing a paper the interviewer provided to you). While you may not be fully expected to know everything, try to be absolutely thorough with your fundamental subject concepts and thoroughly learn your previous projects, the rationale, why you did the project. The same goes for paper presentation, try to understand the rationale and future course of research as the researcher is actually trying to learn if you can build on his ongoing research. Also, be aware and enthusiastic about the interviewers research works, at least in a broad way. Ask questions at the end. Let them know your preferences
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
Would you be willing to work on "X" related project because you have previously worked on "Y" ?
Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. La procedura ha richiesto 2 mesi. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Technion
Colloquio
Online application to the university (including resume, research interests, and recommendation letters), an on-site panel interview with several researchers from the specific department, a follow-up one-on-one phone interview with a researcher, decision via email
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
1. Describe a research project you have undertaken
2. Why did you use a specific methodology?
3. What was the theoretical background?