I had two interviews. The first was a quick introduction where I provided information about what drew me to Tia. The second interview was a practice of being given various scenarios of client questions and concerns. They were seeing how well I was able to prioritize the various tasks given.

I recently interviewed with Tia and was very disappointed with the overall experience. The interview structure felt unorganized and lacked transparency from the start. Instead of a typical conversation to understand my background and fit, the first half of the interview consisted of three mock calls where I was given scenarios with little to no guidance. There was no explanation of their processes, expectations, or what success looked like, which made it feel more like a guessing game than a fair evaluation of my skills. The second half transitioned into standard behavioral questions, which felt more appropriate, but by that point the experience had already set a negative tone. It’s difficult to perform well when you're not set up with the necessary context or tools, and I don’t believe this approach accurately reflects a candidate’s abilities. Overall, the process felt unnecessarily stressful and not aligned with best interview practices. I would recommend that the company provide clearer expectations, better structure, and more support during mock scenarios to create a more fair and professional candidate experience.