Passa al contenutoPassa al piè di pagina
  • Lavori
  • Aziende
  • Stipendi
  • Per le aziende

      Migliora la tua carriera

      Scopri le tue potenzialità di guadagno, trova lavori da sogno e condividi approfondimenti su lavoro e vita privata in forma anonima.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Tiger Data

      Azienda coinvolta

      Chi siamo
      Recensioni
      Stipendi e benefit
      Lavori
      Colloqui
      Colloqui
      Ricerche correlate: Recensioni su Tiger Data | Offerte di lavoro di Tiger Data | Stipendi di Tiger Data | Benefit di Tiger Data
      Colloqui di Tiger DataColloqui per Executive Assistant presso Tiger DataColloquio di Tiger Data


      Glassdoor

      • Chi siamo
      • Contattaci

      Aziende

      • Account Business gratuito
      • Spazio per le aziende
      • Blog per le aziende

      Informazioni

      • Aiuto
      • Linee guida
      • Condizioni d'uso
      • Privacy e scelte pubblicitarie
      • Non vendere né condividere le mie informazioni
      • Strumento per l'accettazione dei cookie

      Lavora con noi

      • Inserzionisti
      • Carriere
      Scarica l'app

      • Cerca:
      • Aziende
      • Lavori
      • Località

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. "Glassdoor," "Worklife Pro," "Bowls" e il relativo logo sono marchi registrati di Glassdoor LLC.

      Aziende seguite

      Non lasciarti sfuggire opportunità e informazioni privilegiate seguendo le aziende dove vorresti lavorare.

      Ricerche di lavoro

      Ricevi suggerimenti e aggiornamenti personalizzati avviando le tue ricerche.

      Colloquio per Executive Assistant

      25 lug 2025
      Candidato anonimo a colloquio
      New York, NY
      Nessuna offerta
      Esperienza negativa
      Colloquio nella media

      Candidatura

      Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un selezionatore. La procedura ha richiesto 5 mesi. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Tiger Data (New York, NY) nel mese di lug 2025

      Colloquio

      I was initially contacted by a recruiter and went through three rounds of interviews, only to be told that the role was suddenly put on hold due to a hiring freeze. A few weeks later, they reached out again to resume the process, and I participated in another two to three rounds. The final round was with the Chief People Officer, who appeared disengaged and dismissive during the conversation. I was also asked to complete a timed "exercise" that required sorting data in six minutes, but was not allowed to use basic keyboard functions like copy/paste. The task felt unrealistic and disconnected from the actual job requirements. This entire process, especially for a short-term, 6-month contract role, felt disorganized, unnecessarily lengthy, and at times, disrespectful to candidates' time and efforts. I would caution others to carefully consider whether it's worth investing time into their hiring process.

      Domande di colloquio [1]

      Domanda 1

      Instructions: You have 6 minutes to complete the following task. Below, you'll find a list of job candidates that need to be organized and processed according to our data retention policy. You must type your organized results, demonstrating your ability to categorize information and apply company policies accurately. Your Tasks: 1. Categorize each candidate into the appropriate category: ○ Category A: Engineering candidates (Software Engineers, DevOps, Data Scientists, QA, etc.) ○ Category B: SG&A candidates (HR, Finance, Operations, Admin, etc.) ○ Category C: Go-to-Market candidates (Sales, Marketing, Business Development, Account Management, Customer Success, Product Marketing, etc.) 2. Determine discard date based on our retention policy: ○ Interviewed candidates: Discard information 2 years after interview date ○ Not interviewed candidates: Discard information 6 months after application date ○ IMPORTANT: If the retention deadline has already passed based on today's date, mark the discard date as "DISCARD NOW" to indicate immediate action is required 3. Fix any obvious data inconsistencies you notice
      Rispondi alla domanda
      1