1. Applied online by creating a profile (profile cannot be edited as long as you are still in the interviewing process).
2. Short interview with a generalist, nothing special.
3. Online test. It was OK.
4. Interview with a specialist in the role. Now, here comes the tricky part. The interviewer was quite detached, asked questions about my understanding of the role, etc. He then gave me a riddle to answer. I wasn't impressed. He said it was to show how I think. Then gave me a case study to work on.
That last part, I thought, needed improvement. The interviewer himself didn't seem that experienced, so a couple of things I said he disagreed with, and instead of engaging in a conversation, he decided my answers were wrong answers. The case study included a lot of points to cover for 10 minutes. I felt that what I covered, which was a lot I think, was dismissed and there was only pointing to what I missed. Of course, we miss things in less than 10 minutes.
All in all, I think the interviewers should be more experienced to be able to see if what they are hearing is wrong or a different way of looking at things, or simply things they haven't learned yet.
What I liked though is that the interview focuses on your skills not what you have or have not done before, and the process went quite fast.