Passa al contenutoPassa al piè di pagina
  • Lavori
  • Aziende
  • Stipendi
  • Per le aziende

      Migliora la tua carriera

      Scopri le tue potenzialità di guadagno, trova lavori da sogno e condividi approfondimenti su lavoro e vita privata in forma anonima.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Unipart

      Azienda coinvolta

      Circa
      Recensioni
      Stipendi e benefit
      Lavori
      Colloqui
      Colloqui
      Ricerche correlate: Recensioni su Unipart | Offerte di lavoro di Unipart | Stipendi di Unipart | Benefit di Unipart
      Colloqui di UnipartColloqui per Linux Engineer presso UnipartColloquio di Unipart


      Glassdoor

      • Chi siamo
      • Contattaci

      Aziende

      • Account Business gratuito
      • Spazio per le aziende
      • Blog per le aziende

      Informazioni

      • Aiuto
      • Linee guida
      • Condizioni d'uso
      • Privacy e scelte pubblicitarie
      • Non vendere né condividere le mie informazioni
      • Strumento per l'accettazione dei cookie

      Lavora con noi

      • Inserzionisti
      • Carriere
      Scarica l'app

      • Cerca:
      • Aziende
      • Lavori
      • Località

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. "Glassdoor," "Worklife Pro," "Bowls" e il relativo logo sono marchi registrati di Glassdoor LLC.

      Aziende seguite

      Non lasciarti sfuggire opportunità e informazioni privilegiate seguendo le aziende dove vorresti lavorare.

      Ricerche di lavoro

      Ricevi suggerimenti e aggiornamenti personalizzati avviando le tue ricerche.

      Colloquio per Linux Engineer

      6 set 2020
      Candidato anonimo a colloquio
      Cambridge, East of England, England
      Nessuna offerta
      Esperienza negativa
      Colloquio difficile

      Candidatura

      Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un selezionatore. La procedura ha richiesto 2 mesi. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Unipart (Cambridge, East of England, England) nel mese di set 2020

      Colloquio

      Stage 1: Tech Assessment Stage 2: Informal Phone interview Stage 3: Formal interview in Cambridge - 1 hour 45 minutes I was the only attendee not wearing jeans; First 10 minutes was looking over the Tech Assessment (bit late as I would have thought they would have reviewed that a couple of stages ago). 10 minutes of going through the questions I did NOT answer as they were developer questions. I had attempted a C programming question which they went to great lengths to prove that on a linux x86 system I had answered correctly but on some older unix running RISC or other it could be different. As they attempted to ask me to remain at a whiteboard to go through another C question I halted the interview and sat down. Not being schoolboy age any longer I thought it wrong that I was being treated like one, though I held my tongue (mostly) and pointed out that I was not continuing in this way (I knew then this was not the place for me). I was then asked in depth networking questions that had so far not needed to be known by me for 23 years of being a linux sysadmin. The interview continued with noting I was APMG certified but they did not think Agile really worked. This led on to be told the role was for Regulatory Compliance and programming - maybe I could be trained to be a coder and debug their own developers' code when it didn't work? At 1 hour and 30 minutes I effectively ended the process when I asked the question if they had any linux servers. The response was yes, many, why do you ask? The reason was because in 1 hour 30 minutes they hadn't mentioned it or asked me about anything linux. Quite strange for an interview for a linux engineer.

      Domande di colloquio [1]

      Domanda 1

      As a previous reviewer has done, I will include the question here that they were so keen on: If a physically inaccessible computer attached to your local network segment is firewalling all IP traffic, how would you find out if it is up or not? [Hint: this question is very precisely worded.] They eluded to the fact that they intended the answer to be using a switch to find arp record for the device. As they had said the question is very precisely worded - they had not included the use of a switch in the question - some very small office networks just have a dumb hub that doesn't let you do this but hey, why worry about playing by your own, precisely worded rules?
      1 risposta
      2
      avatar
      Risposta di Unipart
      5y
      Thank you for taking the time to leave a review and share your thoughts of our interview process. Unipart has an incredibly strong track record in training and developing excellent people and we want our colleagues to have long and varied careers that stretch and develop their skills. Therefore we recruit for attitude and aptitude, and believe that our robust recruitment process supports this. However, it is not acceptable that you feel like this about your interview experience with us. If you wish to discuss in further detail, please make contact with sarah.plumb@unipart.com and we will follow up on this for you. We wish you all the best for your future.