Passa al contenutoPassa al piè di pagina
  • Lavori
  • Aziende
  • Stipendi
  • Per le aziende

      Migliora la tua carriera

      Scopri le tue potenzialità di guadagno, trova lavori da sogno e condividi approfondimenti su lavoro e vita privata in forma anonima.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      WSP

      Azienda coinvolta

      Chi siamo
      Recensioni
      Stipendi e benefit
      Lavori
      Colloqui
      Colloqui
      Ricerche correlate: Recensioni su WSP | Offerte di lavoro di WSP | Stipendi di WSP | Benefit di WSP
      Colloqui di WSPColloqui per CAD Technician presso WSPColloquio di WSP


      Glassdoor

      • Chi siamo
      • Contattaci

      Aziende

      • Account Business gratuito
      • Spazio per le aziende
      • Blog per le aziende

      Informazioni

      • Aiuto
      • Linee guida
      • Condizioni d'uso
      • Privacy e scelte pubblicitarie
      • Non vendere né condividere le mie informazioni
      • Strumento per l'accettazione dei cookie

      Lavora con noi

      • Inserzionisti
      • Carriere
      Scarica l'app

      • Cerca:
      • Aziende
      • Lavori
      • Località

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. "Glassdoor," "Worklife Pro," "Bowls" e il relativo logo sono marchi registrati di Glassdoor LLC.

      Aziende seguite

      Non lasciarti sfuggire opportunità e informazioni privilegiate seguendo le aziende dove vorresti lavorare.

      Ricerche di lavoro

      Ricevi suggerimenti e aggiornamenti personalizzati avviando le tue ricerche.

      Colloquio per CAD Technician

      28 nov 2022
      Dipendente anonimo
      Offerta accettata
      Esperienza negativa
      Colloquio difficile

      Candidatura

      Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso WSP

      Colloquio

      I take it you are being interviewed, you are not the one asking the questions. If I was on an interview panel the questions I would ask an entry-level designer would be to gauge how familiar they are with the C3D workflow; can they create alignments, surfaces, profiles, and corridors and do they sound competent at it or can they list direct experience (i.e. "At my last job, I created x number of design corridors, with their associated profiles and cross-sections"), or do they sound vague about any part of it, or they recite a canned answer ("Well I know how to read the help files, and I'm quick to learn!"). After that I'd sound them out about deeper things, do they know how to create styles from scratch and also create styles based on existing styles; have they created custom code sets; are they familiar with manipulating feature lines (describe two ways to change the elevation of a PI point, and explain one reason why a PI might have its elevation locked). Also can they get quantities from their corridor using the materials lists. Maybe ask what the difference is between the datum surface and the top surface, and how each is used to compute quantities. If they sound experienced at all these, I'd delve a little deeper, and ask them for examples of how things went wrong, and what they did to correct it, or how they double-check the results they get from C3D using manual methods. Maybe ask them if they have used Pipe Networks, and give some examples of how. On your side as an interviewee, I'd ask them some questions too: How rigorous and well-defined are their CAD standards, and how are they enforced, do they have a CAD administrator, do they have on-the-job training or mentoring, either formally or informally for teaching their processes and standards to new employees, and do they have a formal QA/QC program. Trick question for that last one: If they say "Yes", then ask them to define what the A and the C stand for, and what they really mean. This is how you tell if they really have a QA/QC program, or if it's just a buzzword they throw out there when asked.