Passa al contenutoPassa al piè di pagina
  • Lavori
  • Aziende
  • Stipendi
  • Per le aziende

      Migliora la tua carriera

      Scopri le tue potenzialità di guadagno, trova lavori da sogno e condividi approfondimenti su lavoro e vita privata in forma anonima.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Wise

      Azienda coinvolta

      Chi siamo
      Recensioni
      Stipendi e benefit
      Lavori
      Colloqui
      Colloqui
      Ricerche correlate: Recensioni su Wise | Offerte di lavoro di Wise | Stipendi di Wise | Benefit di Wise
      Colloqui di WiseColloqui per Data Engineer presso WiseColloquio di Wise


      Glassdoor

      • Chi siamo
      • Contattaci

      Aziende

      • Account Business gratuito
      • Spazio per le aziende
      • Blog per le aziende

      Informazioni

      • Aiuto
      • Linee guida
      • Condizioni d'uso
      • Privacy e scelte pubblicitarie
      • Non vendere né condividere le mie informazioni
      • Strumento per l'accettazione dei cookie

      Lavora con noi

      • Inserzionisti
      • Carriere
      Scarica l'app

      • Cerca:
      • Aziende
      • Lavori
      • Località

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. "Glassdoor," "Worklife Pro," "Bowls" e il relativo logo sono marchi registrati di Glassdoor LLC.

      Aziende seguite

      Non lasciarti sfuggire opportunità e informazioni privilegiate seguendo le aziende dove vorresti lavorare.

      Ricerche di lavoro

      Ricevi suggerimenti e aggiornamenti personalizzati avviando le tue ricerche.

      Colloquio per Data Engineer

      29 giu 2026
      Candidato anonimo a colloquio
      Londra, Inghilterra
      Nessuna offerta
      Esperienza negativa
      Colloquio nella media

      Candidatura

      Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un selezionatore. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Wise (Londra, Inghilterra) nel mese di mar 2026

      Colloquio

      One of my worst experiences with a recruiter (from Wise itself - not external). He involved me in a process that required long preparation, but I never received feedback, which isn't fair considering the effort I dedicated to preparation. I was asked to work on a task that required 4-6 hours and to write a document and prepare an architecture diagram. I presented that, and then they asked me some questions in an hour-long interview. I shared the questions below. NEVER GOT FEEDBACK SINCE THEN.

      Domande di colloquio [1]

      Domanda 1

      Why do you have sanctions/PEP/address checks at the second stage, before manual review — why not after? What technology stack are you familiar with? What do you use at TSB? Where does the case_id come from for the very first events? Can you elaborate on the 3 case sources — what are the second and third ones beyond onboarding? What happens if a doc_verified event arrives before kyc_started, or never arrives? What freshness/completeness SLAs would you set for: ops monitoring, FinCrime dashboard, regulatory reporting? What are the trade-offs between having data near-real-time vs next day? What are your top 3 critical data quality checks for KYC onboarding? Who owns event definitions? Who owns DBT models? Who owns marts? How can you make things compatible with producers when data engineering doesn't own producers? How many engineers do you have, what are you responsible for at TSB? What's the difference between HAVING and WHERE? How do you safely compute a division when the denominator might be zero? What's the difference between INNER JOIN and LEFT JOIN? How do you get the latest row per user? Why is ORDER BY updated_at not enough? How would you investigate the number of incorrectly marked PEP/sanctions checks (false positives) that were later found incorrect by manual review? Which tables, how do you join? How would you get the ratio of onboarding sessions per KYC checks — where do you look in the model? If an attribute needs to be updated over time (e.g., agent reviews happening multiple times), how does that affect your model? What if a customer appeals a rejection and gets re-reviewed by a different agent with a different outcome — how is that reflected? Is it covered? If there are multiple reviews and only the latest is valid, what needs to change?
      Rispondi alla domanda

      Altre recensioni di colloqui per Data Engineer presso Wise

      Colloquio per Data Engineer

      18 mag 2026
      Candidato anonimo a colloquio
      San Paolo del Brasile,
      Offerta rifiutata
      Esperienza negativa
      Colloquio nella media

      Candidatura

      Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Wise (San Paolo del Brasile, ) nel mese di gen 2026

      Colloquio

      A comunicação por parte da recrutadora foi falha. A entrevista foi remarcada sem aviso prévio e, no momento reagendado, ela não conseguiu conduzir a conversa com o devido foco, pois estava cuidando de uma criança.

      Domande di colloquio [1]

      Domanda 1

      Fale sobre seu background profissional.
      Rispondi alla domanda

      Colloquio per Data Engineer

      7 ott 2025
      Candidato anonimo a colloquio
      Tallinn
      Nessuna offerta
      Esperienza neutra
      Colloquio nella media

      Candidatura

      Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Wise (Tallinn)

      Colloquio

      The recruiter was very kind, communicative, and professional throughout the process, and the pair programming session didn't go well. However unfortunately, I didn’t continue to the next stage of the interview process afterward.

      Domande di colloquio [1]

      Domanda 1

      memorry allocation in k8s pods
      Rispondi alla domanda