Dreadful, haphazard and extremely unprofessional. The selection is based on who could be a better scapegoat, or who wouldn't question when relentless work will be given. The interviewers have no communication amongst themselves, so each candidate will be judged on random questions. Interviewers are extremely unprofessional, the way they talk, the arrogance they show, is all because they don't want to be taking the interviews in the first place. I saw extremely worthy candidates being rejected and average ones being taken ahead. If anyone gets rejected, well many better companies out there, who will respect your work and life both, won't burden you with relentless work, and will pay you for your effort. And to the managers taking the fit rounds etc get off your high horses, because you were in place of these young determined candidates at one point. Don't just reject people because of your own damn insecurities. Thank you, rant complete.

Normal process consisting of DI and analysis. HR interview was also very interactive. Interview was more for testing analytical skills and communicational skills as well. Knowledge about company work and background was also checked.