Something clearly went wrong in the interview process. None of my original interviewers seemed to be aware of my interview, and both were absent. Since their process required the interview to take place two days after the assignment, someone had to step in at the last minute. It felt rushed and disorganised.
The substitute interviewer seemed distracted and uninterested and, at times, came across as dismissive and unnecessarily harsh. I tried my best to be respectful and prepared, but the conversation left me feeling discouraged rather than evaluated fairly. Some of the feedback I received felt more like a personal judgment than constructive interview feedback.
Overall, the experience gave me the impression that the process was poorly coordinated and not handled with much care.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
Standard questions such as why this company, why this role, and some clarification of my CV, followed by questions about the assignment. They also seemed to be looking for “magic words” that would demonstrate a strong business mindset.
Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite l'università. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso frog (Parigi) nel mese di apr 2021
Colloquio
Process for the position of junior consultant on permanent contract:
-HR interview (1h, English test, motivation, classic HR questions)
-Digital presentation + pitch of the presentation
-Manager interview (1h, motivation, career path, situational analysis)
-Case study interview with a director (1 hour interview including 30 minutes of case studies in strategy & management)
-VP interview (1 hour, motivation and background)
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
Why frog ?
Could you tell me about an innovative company?
etc
Dear Team member,
Thank you for taking the time post this review and for providing others with insightful feedback.
Glad to have you on board!
Wishing you all the very best,
greetings from the pond!
Le migliori aziende per "stipendio e benefit" vicino a te