Worst professional decision I ever made - Recensione dipendente - Engineering presso Array (NY)

1,0
11 mag 2024
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Unfortunately its as bad or worse than everything mentioned in all the reviews. I really can't think of anything good. I guess there are a few good people that mean good but can't do much to change the bad culture.

Svantaggi

1. CEO is unethical. 2. Majority of tech is 16 years old and of embarrassingly bad quality. 3. Barring any exceptions, anyone with reasonable skills or little motivation has either already left or was let go. At least in engineering only people that are still there are the ones that have no other option. Vast majority of engineers lack technical skills and experience and are unaware of any industry practices. It seems like a bunch amateur freelancers just hacked together few projects. Not suggesting they are all bad human beings, but they just don't know what good looks like or have just resigned to their fate. 4. Business model doesn't seem sustainable either and I am not sure how long it will be financially viable to run. They may have a fire sale and sell for scraps. Likely it will be just selling existing contracts to competitors, I don't believe there much to be redeemed or repurposed from product perspective. Its unlikely that any engineers will get any upside out of their equity. 5. Overall very toxic culture, it will suck all enthusiasm and joy out of you. There is nothing new to learn and push back on any fresh ideas. Stress took a toll on my mental health and I felt so relieved once I got out. I wouldn't recommend it to anyone. If I had option to give 0 stars ratings I would have.

Esplora altre recensioni su Array (NY)

5,0
1 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Clear expectations at a very stable organization.

Svantaggi

High expectations can lead to friction in some cases

1,0
6 apr 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Got paid for interview and onboarding

Svantaggi

I went through what felt like a “ghost job” type of process. I was given a two-day technical assessment that required very little sleep and included pulling an all-nighter. The assignment was highly realistic and closely resembled production-level work in both scope and expectations. A significant amount of time and effort was required before even having a clearly established or confirmed role. This also included a CCAT assessment as part of the screening process, along with employment verification, ~45 pages of documents, and several hours of video content. After that, I was asked to record two 5–10 minute videos based on those materials, with very minimal prompts and no clear grading criteria or expectations. I was then told I scored just slightly below “acceptable” and was terminated immediately. The entire process felt disorganized from start to finish. The technical assessment was missing key pieces, almost as if it was incomplete or still being tested. During onboarding, I was already being added to meetings and even assigned a task, despite not having fully completed the onboarding process. Part of the reasoning given for my termination was that I wasn’t proactive in pointing out that I had been added to meetings and should have been focusing on onboarding instead. This was especially confusing, as those meetings and tasks were initiated by the team themselves. Given the amount of upfront work required and how the process was structured, this raised serious concerns for me about whether the role was clearly defined or fully established, and whether the expectations for candidates were aligned with an actual longterm position. Advice to others: Be cautious about the time commitment required before the role is fully secured. The process may require substantial effort upfront without clear expectations or evaluation criteria.

9
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto