Not enough words to explain this experience - Recensione dipendente - Medical Technologist presso Atrium Health

2,0
9 set 2016
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

There are opportunities to take continuing education and advance your skills if you work in the right area. I have met some nice people. You earn vacation at a nice rate the provide dedicated and good patient care. You get a paycheck.

Svantaggi

Let me begin: 1. There is absolutely no communication 2. The health insurance is terrible-the insurer is partly owned by CHS and the deductibles are ridiculous plus you cannot even get a prescription or doctors visit until you meet it. While there is a Live Well plan it doesn't touch the out of pocket costs 3 No raises to speak of.....if lucky you might snag a2%, mine 1.7% with a great evaluation 4. Management was terrible in my department.....again no communication cloaked in just being indifferent. 5. Short staffed a lot 6. High turnover 7. An attitude of the "good old boys club" 8. Have never worked for a healthcare institution that is in the newspaper as much as this one, not in a good way 9. A monopoly in Charlotte so there is nowhere else to really go and try know that 10. The CEO that left recently made so....much while I watched people I woke with just making it day to day. Disheartening.

Esplora altre recensioni su Atrium Health

5,0
27 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Good benefits, work life balance

Svantaggi

have to use PTO for holidays

2,0
21 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

I spent many years in outpatient rehabilitation and saw firsthand how much meaningful patient care can happen when clinicians are empowered. Earlier in my tenure, there were real opportunities for growth, mentorship and professional development. The team was collaborative and deeply committed to patients, and support staff worked hard under challenging circumstances. Those are strengths worth acknowledging.

Svantaggi

As leadership changed, the culture around performance and advancement shifted. Over time I felt that institutional memory, specialty expertise and long‑term contributions were not valued consistently. Promotion practices seemed opaque, and I saw clinicians with substantially less experience and questionable communication acumen move into roles without clear explanations. Most importantly, I experienced increasing friction between high performers and leaders whose roles felt more performative than grounded in clinical or operational expertise. That tension appeared to be tolerated by the institution. Questions about decisions were discouraged, and requests for discussion went unanswered—even when they came from people with decades of service and a record of strong outcomes. After years of above‑average performance reviews, the feedback I received near the end of my tenure seemed inconsistent with my record and, in my view, hypocritical. This sudden shift in narrative felt like a mechanism to justify decisions already made rather than an honest assessment. For clinicians who invest deeply in their programs and relationships, contradictory or last‑minute feedback is demoralizing and undermines trust in the review process. Although department leaders appear to view themselves as emotionally intelligent, my experience was quite different: they delivered polished, stoic performances but did not exhibit the empathy, listening, or unbiased 360 assessment skills that clinicians need from leadership. That disconnect was another source of friction between high performers and management.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto