Scared for patients!!!! - Recensione dipendente - Lab Technician presso Atrium Health

2,0
29 gen 2018
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

There isn't any pros anymore! The reviews that are saying CHS live well is great, and benefits are wonderful, are employees whom work in the HR offices..

Svantaggi

The lab has the biggest turnover in the hospital, phlebotomist often work alone, causing patients lab work to late, and there is times when a patients labs are missed!! no one person can handle ICU, Code Blues, Rapid Responses, all floors and the ED!! the lab is short by 7 people and they will not replace them. Management changes the schedules to fit their needs, they could care less about your home life. We work more days with less hours so we don't have overtime. benefits are horrible. We do the job of three and get paid for one.

Esplora altre recensioni su Atrium Health

5,0
13 feb 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Great training and culture. There is continuing education throughout the year.

Svantaggi

I had no cons for this job. I loved working here.

2,0
21 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

I spent many years in outpatient rehabilitation and saw firsthand how much meaningful patient care can happen when clinicians are empowered. Earlier in my tenure, there were real opportunities for growth, mentorship and professional development. The team was collaborative and deeply committed to patients, and support staff worked hard under challenging circumstances. Those are strengths worth acknowledging.

Svantaggi

As leadership changed, the culture around performance and advancement shifted. Over time I felt that institutional memory, specialty expertise and long‑term contributions were not valued consistently. Promotion practices seemed opaque, and I saw clinicians with substantially less experience and questionable communication acumen move into roles without clear explanations. Most importantly, I experienced increasing friction between high performers and leaders whose roles felt more performative than grounded in clinical or operational expertise. That tension appeared to be tolerated by the institution. Questions about decisions were discouraged, and requests for discussion went unanswered—even when they came from people with decades of service and a record of strong outcomes. After years of above‑average performance reviews, the feedback I received near the end of my tenure seemed inconsistent with my record and, in my view, hypocritical. This sudden shift in narrative felt like a mechanism to justify decisions already made rather than an honest assessment. For clinicians who invest deeply in their programs and relationships, contradictory or last‑minute feedback is demoralizing and undermines trust in the review process. Although department leaders appear to view themselves as emotionally intelligent, my experience was quite different: they delivered polished, stoic performances but did not exhibit the empathy, listening, or unbiased 360 assessment skills that clinicians need from leadership. That disconnect was another source of friction between high performers and management.

1
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto