Intermediate Application Specialist (CORE) - Recensione dipendente - Intermediate Applications Specialist presso Atrium Health

2,0
20 ago 2018
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Remote one day of the week.

Svantaggi

Unhealthy environment - gossips around department is a distraction. I worked there for 6 months. Barely into 3 months and my manager got fired, teammate that got hired with me transferred out, one of the senior application specialist resigned for another offer. Awkward, awkward environment. Leadership never came and talked with me or showed that they cared and valued my devotion to keeping project ongoing. Leadership praises themselves to be supportive to employees growth and development, but when it comes to it they always run out of fundings. Leadership has their favorites and if you’re not one of them, they expect you to suck it up with your shorter end of the stick. Promotion is a political decision and not base on skills/talent. If you do take the offer, good luck as a sitting duck for the next 10 yrs. Move on, pay isn’t worth it. Respect yourself.

Esplora altre recensioni su Atrium Health

5,0
27 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Good benefits, work life balance

Svantaggi

have to use PTO for holidays

1
2,0
21 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

I spent many years in outpatient rehabilitation and saw firsthand how much meaningful patient care can happen when clinicians are empowered. Earlier in my tenure, there were real opportunities for growth, mentorship and professional development. The team was collaborative and deeply committed to patients, and support staff worked hard under challenging circumstances. Those are strengths worth acknowledging.

Svantaggi

As leadership changed, the culture around performance and advancement shifted. Over time I felt that institutional memory, specialty expertise and long‑term contributions were not valued consistently. Promotion practices seemed opaque, and I saw clinicians with substantially less experience and questionable communication acumen move into roles without clear explanations. Most importantly, I experienced increasing friction between high performers and leaders whose roles felt more performative than grounded in clinical or operational expertise. That tension appeared to be tolerated by the institution. Questions about decisions were discouraged, and requests for discussion went unanswered—even when they came from people with decades of service and a record of strong outcomes. After years of above‑average performance reviews, the feedback I received near the end of my tenure seemed inconsistent with my record and, in my view, hypocritical. This sudden shift in narrative felt like a mechanism to justify decisions already made rather than an honest assessment. For clinicians who invest deeply in their programs and relationships, contradictory or last‑minute feedback is demoralizing and undermines trust in the review process. Although department leaders appear to view themselves as emotionally intelligent, my experience was quite different: they delivered polished, stoic performances but did not exhibit the empathy, listening, or unbiased 360 assessment skills that clinicians need from leadership. That disconnect was another source of friction between high performers and management.

1
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto