Dysfunctional Company and It Starts at the Top - Recensione dipendente - Registrar presso Atrium Health

1,0
5 ott 2013
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

There is absolutely nothing positive I can think of about Carolinas HealthCare System at this point in time. It has been a bad company to work for for years and it is just going to get worse with the new medical legislation going into place.

Svantaggi

All the money goes to upper level management and the CEO, Michael Tarwater. Lower level employees get virtually nothing. Raises are capped at around 1%. There is no chance for advancement unless you are prepared to kiss upper management's ring or you know someone. I have never worked for a company this dysfunctional nor have I ever been this unhappy at a position. For a CEO of a non-profit organization to get $4 million between salary and bonuses, fly the company jet for personal business, and then tell his employees there is not enough money for decent raises is just disgusting. If you are planning to work in upper level management it is a great company but for all the people that make the money, it is just not worth it.

Esplora altre recensioni su Atrium Health

5,0
27 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Good benefits, work life balance

Svantaggi

have to use PTO for holidays

1
2,0
21 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

I spent many years in outpatient rehabilitation and saw firsthand how much meaningful patient care can happen when clinicians are empowered. Earlier in my tenure, there were real opportunities for growth, mentorship and professional development. The team was collaborative and deeply committed to patients, and support staff worked hard under challenging circumstances. Those are strengths worth acknowledging.

Svantaggi

As leadership changed, the culture around performance and advancement shifted. Over time I felt that institutional memory, specialty expertise and long‑term contributions were not valued consistently. Promotion practices seemed opaque, and I saw clinicians with substantially less experience and questionable communication acumen move into roles without clear explanations. Most importantly, I experienced increasing friction between high performers and leaders whose roles felt more performative than grounded in clinical or operational expertise. That tension appeared to be tolerated by the institution. Questions about decisions were discouraged, and requests for discussion went unanswered—even when they came from people with decades of service and a record of strong outcomes. After years of above‑average performance reviews, the feedback I received near the end of my tenure seemed inconsistent with my record and, in my view, hypocritical. This sudden shift in narrative felt like a mechanism to justify decisions already made rather than an honest assessment. For clinicians who invest deeply in their programs and relationships, contradictory or last‑minute feedback is demoralizing and undermines trust in the review process. Although department leaders appear to view themselves as emotionally intelligent, my experience was quite different: they delivered polished, stoic performances but did not exhibit the empathy, listening, or unbiased 360 assessment skills that clinicians need from leadership. That disconnect was another source of friction between high performers and management.

1
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto