Vantaggi
Nothing comes to mind as the negatives FAR outweigh ANY positives.
Svantaggi
They are nothing like they portray. The supervisors here are mean and nasty and "lead" with intimidation and fear. They micromanage every single thing you do and are very arrogant and aloof. The sup I was assigned to was the last person I would ask a question. They don't have to actually do the job yet will tell you how bad you are at it. There is no development you are either perfect or you are gone. It has become a turnover factory because no one wants to work there as the job itself is extremely stressful. The force you to work 9, 10 hours and 6 days a week and getting PTO is basically impossible so there is no work/life balance. This is a hostile stressful environment and in a short span I witnessed several people being done dirty by them. One of the other reviews said it depends on the supervisor/manager you get and if you get a bad one they make your life hell and do everything they can to prevent you from advancing. It is very poorly managed because upper management is always having parties during the middle of the work day while others work. This is the 1st company I have ever seen that the managers do not actually work. Their sole job is to harass you. It isn't worth your health or mental health. All their systems are ancient and break just about every day. The are trying to grow before they fix the issues. Also management works Monday through Friday so they don't feel the stress you do they also can come and go as they please long as they go to their million meetings a day. They just sit on their high horse and judge.
Vantaggi
Self manage, managers don’t micro manage. Remote work. Great benefits. Good culture. Competitive pay.
Svantaggi
There can be lots of changes when you’re hired.
Vantaggi
There are many employees who care about the mission, values, each other, and members.
Svantaggi
Within the Technology organization, there is growing concern regarding the consistency and transparency of hiring and promotion practices following the 2023 CTO transition. Over a relatively short period, the composition of senior leadership changed significantly, with a large percentage of new hires and promotions appearing to originate from overlapping professional networks, referral pipelines, or ethnic background. There is perception that advancement opportunities increasingly favored candidates connected to existing leadership circles, raising concerns about whether hiring standards and evaluation processes are being applied consistently across Tech. As these leadership changes cascaded through reporting structures, teams became increasingly homogeneous in background and prior affiliations. This contributed to employee concerns about reduced diversity, diminished internal mobility, and the potential for affinity bias in hiring and promotion decisions. The resulting leadership composition also became noticeably less diverse over time, which contributed to perceptions of affinity bias and employees outside the dominant leadership network can appear sidelined in promotions, influence, and career growth opportunities, contributing to a perception of favoritism and inconsistent standards. As leadership composition became noticeably less diverse, the corresponding teams become less diverse as well.