Avoid at all costs unless you're desperate for money - Recensione dipendente - Enterprise Account Executive presso BILL

1,0
16 apr 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The compensation package is pretty great. The Supplier Growth team has a floor commission policy that guarantees commission payouts without having to close any deals.

Svantaggi

- The "product" is terrible. They charge 6 figures to basically generate a daily excel spreadsheet that's not customizable and can pretty much only be delivered to the customer via email. It's the worst SaaS product I've ever seen - The GTM strategy is focused on how to cause more pain for the prospects to force them into a purchase rather than actually trying to offer a valuable solution that solves problems - The "solution" that is sold addresses a problem that BILL itself created - There is 0 training whatsoever, you're given a mentor and are supposed to just reach out to them every time you need help with something, which is extremely frequent because there are a million ad-hoc tasks thrown at you that don't help you progress deals in any way - There is never a Close Lost deal. If you get a no, the expectation is to "find a new path" and continuously reach out to other employees at the company

Esplora altre recensioni su BILL

5,0
2 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Good work overall and great

Svantaggi

Not a lot of cons at all

1,0
4 giu 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

René is the only pros here :)

Svantaggi

The CTO selection appears misaligned with the company’s future technology needs. The organization requires leadership that combines strategic vision with hands-on understanding of modern architectures, AI-driven development practices, and high-velocity engineering execution. Although the candidate may have delivered meaningful contributions earlier in their career, recent outcomes raise concerns about their ability to drive technological agility. The systems and frameworks developed under their direction became cumbersome to maintain, with even minor modifications requiring disproportionate effort and extended delivery timelines. This level of engineering inefficiency is a significant warning sign for a technology leader responsible for accelerating innovation and execution. René Bill has already paid a heavy price for this, else today it would have been better positioned :( Given the pace of change in today’s technology landscape, the company would be better served by a CTO who can balance architectural rigor with adaptability, speed, and forward-looking technical vision.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto