Client Vs. Member Satisfaction - Recensione dipendente - Program Manager presso CGI

3,0
7 ago 2016
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

CGI has a number of longstanding stable accounts Decent share plan and 401k, though, neither are amazing. Decent entry level positions.

Svantaggi

Client satisfaction seems to be a much greater focus than member satisfaction. - CGI has lower pay for members likely due to low bidding - CGI lacks conflict management relating to protecting members from client's poor behaviors - CGI has very little focus on member career progression, largeat focus is on keeping seats filled Entry Level Positions pay low and increases are meager, which includes promotions. Meaning standard raises occur and seem to ignore CGI and client specific role/title changes. Build your resume and get out.

Esplora altre recensioni su CGI

5,0
27 mag 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Good work environment Strong leadership

Svantaggi

Room for growth can be limited unless you really seek it out.

1,0
16 giu 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Svantaggi

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto