Avoid if you have other options. - Recensione dipendente - Director presso CGI

2,0
5 feb 2018
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

- Hands-off management structure - Flexible schedule

Svantaggi

- Benefits sub-par - No merit raises, frequently not even cost of living increases. Wages across entire company stagnant. Management get 5-figure bonuses. Workers are lucky to get anything at all. - Company is frugal to the point of the ridiculous. No investment is made in members at all. No training. Any training (PMP, etc.) have to be done on member's own nickel and time. - Message is made very clear to workforce that you are easily replaceable. - Internal technology is embarrassingly bad. - Advancement/promotions are seemingly arbitrary, based usually on member's relationship with upper management, not competence. If you ask management what the path to advancement is, a lot of unquantifiable, subjective "qualities" will be described. The bottom line is that there are too many people at management level, and if they promote more people, their bonuses will decrease. -Very bland, unidentifiable corporate culture.

Esplora altre recensioni su CGI

5,0
18 giu 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Work life balance, growth, quality

Svantaggi

Less pay compared to market

1,0
16 giu 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Svantaggi

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto