Very mature stable and professional place to work - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso CGI

4,0
3 giu 2011
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Some of the best people to work with, offers flexibility in work and the culture of work is task oriented not 'hours spent in office' oriented - you will be recognized for accomplishing the task, not by hours you are in the office, open door policy - you can approach any level of management with any issue you want to talk about

Svantaggi

promotion strucutre is rigid and at times not adhered to, recognition of hard work can get ignored although that could be more circumstantial. Because the company is very large (over 30,000 employees worlwide), there is not much personal touch - the bench policy is very harsh (you get laid off when you are on bench for 3 weeks and do not find a project, even though you may have been a good performer and have successfully completed your previous role).

Esplora altre recensioni su CGI

5,0
20 apr 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Culture and work/life balance are what has kept me here

Svantaggi

Benefits, salary could be better

1,0
16 giu 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Svantaggi

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto