Vantaggi
-Great staff -Great mission -35-hour work week -Get all the holidays off (both federal and state) -Good benefits -Good entry job to get that 2-3 years experience
Svantaggi
-Toxic and dysfunctional work environment, lots of gossip and complaining. -HIGH TURNOVER, makes it difficult to get projects done. -Take on projects outside of job description with no compensation or positive feedback. -Poor leadership, primarily due to the CEO who micromanages managers and directors which makes communication and guidance to staff inconsistent and unclear. -Managers are overworked and underpaid. Difficult for them to check in with their staff regularly. -Only department directors have their own office (except the Deputy CEO, they get their own office), everyone sits in cubicles. -Gaslighting is real here -No weekly team meetings or regular check ins which makes it difficult to stay on the same page or stay up to date -HR no longer announces new hires company-wide. Only on department level so you come to the office and see new faces but have no idea who they are which is quite awkward. -Kitchen is still closed even though staff are required to come into the office and no coffee at the coffee station (just leftovers from before the shut down in 2020). -CEO does not engage with staff. We used to have mostly all staff meetings with team building exercises. Since the shut down in March 2020, not a single meeting but departments have held monthly meetings via Zoom then MS Teams (at least the Research and Public Health Department, can't say for others since, well, no one really knows what is going on in other departments without any sort of company-wide meeting so staff have to rely on gossip for info). -Internal Review process is time-consuming and makes it impossible to publish documents in a reasonable and timely manner. They claim 6 weeks but larger reports have been under review going on more than a year. Plus the CEO has to approve EVERYTHING. From event flyers to Power Points to project summary reports, everything must go through: manager -> director -> Communications Specialist --> Grants Writer (if applicable) --> COO --> Deputy CEO --> CEO. This is not a good use of the CEO's time, in my opinion. -No upward mobility to advance one's career.