Good company with room for improvements - Recensione dipendente - Quality Assurance presso Catalent Pharma

4,0
19 ott 2025
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Generous PTO, although people are sometimes asked by managerial staff to complete work on their PTO, even if they are out of state. Relatively good health insurance. There is a 3% 401K match, but this value is all over in other companies and industries. I've seen 0% match - 10% match, but its always good to be on the better side, so it could be improved. There are so many nice, kind people there to work with that will help you out if you don't know how to complete a task. Working from home on occasion is allowed if your role and manager permit it.

Svantaggi

At my previous companies, it had been ingrained in me by big pharma that external training and conferences were needed for personal and professional growth, so I quickly noticed Catalent doesn't provide external trainings that aren't sponsored by them or annual attendance to conferences, which is is important for specialized expertise, fresh perspectives, and a dedicated learning environment, helping to organize and stay current with industry trends, improve employee skills and morale, and provide networking. It can also be more efficient and cost-effective than internal training, especially when expertise is needed. It also shows that you care about your employees and want to provide them with growth. I believe it should start at an early level and not when an employee reaches a senioror managerial state. I recommend employees just pay for their own external training or conferences. Because I was the most experienced in my specialty at my site, I also focused on peer-to-peer training with upper level personnel more experienced than me who worked at other sites and I learned so much! I bonded with some operations and QA personnel at other sites who were always helpful when I had a question, or sent me to a different person if they didn't know the answer. They were all so kind and I still talk to them to this day even though I don't work there anymore. Everybody needs mentors and coaches, but you really need to put yourself out there! Sometimes the number of employees at meetings can get excessive - limiting it to less than 10 people will promote more productive, efficient, and collaborative discussions. Larger meetings often lose focus and disengage participants who feel their contributions aren't necessary. I think it's the 8-18-1800 rule, or Jeff Bezos's 2 pizza principle. There isn't much opportunity for career growth or changes in career. The role you are hired for is likely the one you will stay in until you outgrow it and leave the company. Also, senior level management gets promoted very frequently, while those below rarely get promoted. There used to be a "bubble assignment" opportunity where employees could try out another department, say for 6 months, giving good insight to other departments and possible career changes. I'm not sure why, and employees were never told, but this was eliminated by upper management and now there are no opportunities to explore.

Esplora altre recensioni su Catalent Pharma

5,0
26 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The team is incredibly welcoming, knowledgeable, and supportive, which has made it easy to learn and feel comfortable asking questions. There is a strong focus on training and collaboration, helping me feel safe, well prepared, and confident in my role. I also appreciate the benefits, which support a good work-life balance.

Svantaggi

One area for improvement is the flexibility for new employees regarding remote work hours.

1,0
30 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

A lot of talented folks in the work-force.

Svantaggi

Extreme toxic politics and favoritism. HR practices the maximum possible hypocritical standards, while preaching to employees with cliche trainings. Growth programs such as nextgen leaders are not broadly communicated, and there is limited visibility across the employee base regarding eligibility, nomination, and selection processes. Many employees are not aware that these programs exist. Selection is only by proximity to leadership or informal connections rather than clearly defined and consistently applied merit criteria. These tools are just reserved to apply favoritism with fake merit scores with no fairness and consistency or equal opportunities for all. Lack of consistent application of HR policies and processes across different levels of the organization. HR shows blind obedience to every leader who only stays for 2 years or less, and not to the company or employees who are the backbone for the company. Performance and merit are ignored, there is a very visible inner circle around certain leaders, and their actions loudly and intentionally say favoritism is their brand. No flexibility for employees with childcare, elder care obligations, or medical accommodation, and such requests are subject to heightened scrutiny or inconsistent approval processes, or passive aggressive retaliation. Lower level management is pressured into taking serious high risk decisions, while there is a lot of hesitancy among most of leaders to take formal accountability for compliance related decisions, with clear sign offs. Lot of closed-door, unapproachable and unavailable leaders, who never show up for client meetings, compliance meetings or any other high stake meetings important for the business. They hired a top heavy highly paid CI team, who conducts very loud meetings in shared areas, with zero care how their loud meetings in shared spaces ruin focus and disrupt everyone else's work. These folks do not contribute to any department work and help out, or resolve any real problems. Instead of spending huge budget for such teams, they should spend that budget to get more licenses for software, or equipment, or hiring for core teams who actually bring the money and add value to the company.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto