employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Center for Child Protection

Questa è la tua azienda?

Awesome staff, sub-par administration. - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso Center for Child Protection

3,0
31 mar 2022
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

-The Center's mission is clear and is at the forefront of everyone's efforts -A building full of social workers means that for the most part, everyone is really kind to each other -Better quality of life than most non profits I've worked at -Part time employees make virtually the same rate as their full time counterparts, just without the benefits and full time hours

Svantaggi

-Administrators are out of touch with the employees under them. -Way, way, too many meetings. -All staff (not just direct service workers) are pressured into working directly with the kids coming in for appointments. This is not communicated during the application process. This is a task that should only be done by trained social workers, as it is unfair to traumatized children to have a random operations employee babysit them instead of someone much more qualified to give trauma-informed supervision. -Some employees are criminally underpaid despite their education, experience, and importance to the Center's function. Management looks for highly qualified applicants and pays them the lowest rate possible. -Some departments are well treated and well staffed. Back-end/ support departments are overworked and underpaid. -DEI is an important priority for client service, but not in hiring/ staffing.

Esplora altre recensioni su Center for Child Protection

5,0
13 feb 2025
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people are nice, there's always room to grow or opportunities to move into new departments, and the work itself really matters. We actually see the children we're helping come through the doors every day. There are also a lot of staff activities and resources to promote connection and mental health wellness, which is helpful considering the heavy content we deal with.

Svantaggi

Child abuse is obviously a hard topic to confront every day. As a non-profit, we also work with community members through the Board of Directors, and there can often be disconnect between their vision and the actual logistics of the day-to-day.

1,0
24 apr 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

My direct coworkers were dedicated.

Svantaggi

The problems here are structural and leadership-driven, and they ultimately pushed out experienced staff who had invested heavily in the organization. Pay is inequitable and dishonest. There is no clear pay structure. Some staff are significantly underpaid while others are not, with no transparency or logic to the disparity. We were told things about pay and job roles that turned out to be untrue. When leadership finally admitted the budget was in the negative, they still gave out bonuses to executives. Incoming management was unprofessional and dismissive. A new CDO came in and immediately disregarded everything the team had built, without taking the time to understand any of it. Rather than coming to us with “help me understand how this works so we can improve it”, she came in dismissive and confrontational. This new CDO came in and was rude to everyone, causing moral to drop. And valuable people to leave. She would talk about other teams and talk about our board members and donors. Anytime a concern was raised about the behavior of this manager it was dismissed. Unfortunately they have continues to let this happen severely impacting our donors, team, and new hires. Leadership skills are not prioritized. Managers don’t communicate well with each other. There are no 1-on-1s, so issues never get addressed proactively. Team members regularly take on responsibilities beyond their job descriptions to fill gaps — and that work goes unacknowledged. We raised concerns about staffing gaps multiple times and were not taken seriously. The team was pushed out rather than retained. It became clear that the goal was to displace our team, not develop it. When you raise concerns, disagree with a decision, or simply aren’t a “yes” person, that’s treated as a problem. Good people left because they weren’t valued. I will be leaving not because I want to leave the mission, but because I no longer feel respected or safe staying. The CEO is checked out and HR is not here to protect you and helped the new manager push staff out. Finding ways to purposely put them in uncomfortable positions. This is not a nonprofit I would work for again or. Recommend. DO NOT WORK HERE.

1
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto