It'll take time - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso Chubb

3,0
22 mag 2016
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Learning and development, Knowledgeable employees, staff used to be all team players.

Svantaggi

The acquisition unintentionally reduced the value Chubb had independently. The aggregation of Firemans Fund, Ace, and Chubb created a large company that's going to be dragging its feet for a long time. All of the high performing talent was either let go, left, or currently looking to leave. The historical value of Chubb was that it invested in developing its employees. We often operated under staff but we got it done. We worked as a team and the company offered flexible work arrangements. We were paid significantly less than the market, over worked, and at the core of the business the company consistently faced pricing battles but we found a way to get it done. What your seeing now is the downside of the bell curve . All of the high performing talent are leaving to pursue more challenging work for compensation that clearly meet the industry standards. Chubb is now a place to learn and leave. The company is light years behind in technology, product innovation, branding... The list can go on but the good thing is that these things are repairable. One day Chubb will improve all of these things and the company will return to being on top (US wise). If these issue continue to linger and the company continues to turn over the people that bleed Chubb, this will never happen and the smaller shops will continue to eat Chubb's food and use Chubb's best talent to build better businesses.

Esplora altre recensioni su Chubb

5,0
11 giu 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

It has good people there

Svantaggi

A lot of time spent underwriting

2,0
22 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Business side is smart and is superb at their product

Svantaggi

The IT organization struggles with structural challenges that impact efficiency. The offshore-heavy model in India means US-based employees regularly work early hours to stay aligned, which is unsustainable long-term. The workforce is heavily weighted toward a high-headcount service model rather than investing in strong engineering talent — you need fewer, better engineers, not more bodies. Central tech functions are attempting to build platforms, but without a clear shared understanding of what a platform actually means, these initiatives remain incomplete. The result is heavy manual workarounds propping up half-finished solutions. Strategic direction shifts frequently, and ongoing layoff announcements make it difficult to plan or build momentum.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto