Pros and cons - Recensione dipendente - Marine Engineer presso Crowley

3,0
7 dic 2021
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Good money, fairly easy to get hired.

Svantaggi

Company doesn’t keep their word and will lie to you about relief situations. Also have no problem keeping you on board months longer than you agreed to.

avatar
Risposta di Crowley
4y
We are pleased to hear that you enjoyed the hiring process and compensation at Crowley. We are sorry to hear about your negative experience getting a relief. We'd like to hear more about what transpired so we can work to correct any gaps in the process. If you are open to helping improve the crew change process please contact the crewing manager for your fleet. We appreciate your feedback.

Esplora altre recensioni su Crowley

5,0
7 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Great people, honestly couldn't find a single complaint about the whole team. Lots of opportunities to create new things.

Svantaggi

Maybe too budget constrained lately but that's every corp job anyway.

avatar
Risposta di Crowley
1w
Thank you for sharing your experience and for your contributions over time. We're glad to hear your positive reflections on the team and the opportunity to build and create. We also appreciate your perspective on budget realities. We remain committed to open communication, transparency and learning as we continue to move the business forward.
1,0
27 mar 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Flexible work schedules (hybrid) and new opportunities for some

Svantaggi

My experience with Crowley Maritime Corporation highlights systemic leadership and cultural challenges that significantly impact organizational effectiveness and employee well-being. At a high level, there appears to be a persistent gap in leadership accountability, where individuals in leadership roles who do not demonstrate effective management, communication, or team development capabilities are not addressed or replaced. This lack of corrective action allows ineffective leadership practices to persist, ultimately influencing team performance, morale, and overall operational outcomes. From an organizational culture standpoint, the work environment reflects characteristics commonly associated with toxicity, including limited collaboration, diminished trust, and a lack of psychological safety. There is a noticeable absence of respect in day-to-day interactions, with insufficient emphasis on professional conduct, inclusivity, and mutual support. This environment not only affects employee engagement but also undermines the foundational elements required for high-performing teams. A particularly concerning aspect is the organization’s handling of workforce reductions. During layoffs, there appeared to be minimal effort to explore alternative solutions such as internal redeployment or reassignment of impacted employees to other roles within the organization. This reflects a lack of strategic workforce planning and, more critically, a lack of empathy in decision-making processes that directly affect employees’ livelihoods. The absence of transparent communication and compassionate leadership during these periods further contributed to a perception that employee well-being was not a priority.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto