Unreasonable deadlines and unsupportive leadership - Recensione dipendente - Senior Financial Analyst presso Crowley

1,0
24 gen 2024
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

* hybrid work * pay on time * a lot of independent work, but had to meet tight deadlines constantly

Svantaggi

* Constant gaslighting and making you question yourself and decisions * very high turnover rate in Shipping FP&A (there have been 4 analysts in 2 years for my current role) * management is too focused on meeting all the requests by the leadership team, so that puts even more pressure to deliver. You end up taking out fires instead of having the time to actually build something. * most often, you get requested to deliver something quickly by end of day. * implied here is that there is no project management in place within FP&A * probably due to cutting costs, you're expected to manage two business lines instead of one (say goodbye to work-life balance) * there are no procedures or guides as to how to actually do your work, so there is no standardization, making reproducibility of work difficult from prior analysts. * quality of work also depends on the business line leader you work with. In my case, there was no integration to the team and was just expected as soon as possible. Although I explained that these things take time, they just kept adding additional deliverables while my manager instead of helping, mentioned that it was just part of the job * lastly, nothing is really automated so you have to manually download datasets and manually do your pivots to extract data.

avatar
Risposta di Crowley
2y
Thank you for sharing your feedback and providing valuable insights about your experience as a senior financial analyst at Crowley. We appreciate your transparency and will ensure that your perspective is shared with the finance team for awareness. We are in a transformational period for all our technology and your feedback is important to us as we continuously strive to improve areas of concern within the organization.

Esplora altre recensioni su Crowley

5,0
7 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Great people, honestly couldn't find a single complaint about the whole team. Lots of opportunities to create new things.

Svantaggi

Maybe too budget constrained lately but that's every corp job anyway.

avatar
Risposta di Crowley
1w
Thank you for sharing your experience and for your contributions over time. We're glad to hear your positive reflections on the team and the opportunity to build and create. We also appreciate your perspective on budget realities. We remain committed to open communication, transparency and learning as we continue to move the business forward.
1,0
27 mar 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Flexible work schedules (hybrid) and new opportunities for some

Svantaggi

My experience with Crowley Maritime Corporation highlights systemic leadership and cultural challenges that significantly impact organizational effectiveness and employee well-being. At a high level, there appears to be a persistent gap in leadership accountability, where individuals in leadership roles who do not demonstrate effective management, communication, or team development capabilities are not addressed or replaced. This lack of corrective action allows ineffective leadership practices to persist, ultimately influencing team performance, morale, and overall operational outcomes. From an organizational culture standpoint, the work environment reflects characteristics commonly associated with toxicity, including limited collaboration, diminished trust, and a lack of psychological safety. There is a noticeable absence of respect in day-to-day interactions, with insufficient emphasis on professional conduct, inclusivity, and mutual support. This environment not only affects employee engagement but also undermines the foundational elements required for high-performing teams. A particularly concerning aspect is the organization’s handling of workforce reductions. During layoffs, there appeared to be minimal effort to explore alternative solutions such as internal redeployment or reassignment of impacted employees to other roles within the organization. This reflects a lack of strategic workforce planning and, more critically, a lack of empathy in decision-making processes that directly affect employees’ livelihoods. The absence of transparent communication and compassionate leadership during these periods further contributed to a perception that employee well-being was not a priority.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto