Great place to work to gain experience but organizational changes and focus on protocols prevents advancement. - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso Dow

2,0
2 dic 2010
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Unified corporate focus on safety, ergonomics, and health is refreshing Company culture is easy-going but professional, people are knowledgeable in their fields Flex time is a God send if you've only worked 8-5 throughout your career Depending on the Manager, they will make sure you're recognized for the work that you do

Svantaggi

Very much the system of "its not what you know, it's who you know" to advance in your career Managers and Leaders are so focused on meeting corporate policies and attending meetings they are unable to effectively manage their employees and do their jobs at times For a large company, politics plays a huge role in the type of projects you're assigned and how well the Manager works with you. Bottom line, if the Manager doesn't like you count on being assigned projects that end quickly Little chance of being hired as a Direct employee

Esplora altre recensioni su Dow

5,0
16 apr 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Culture and the technical expertise within the company provide for a working environment where you don't work in silo and everyone is willing to help support you

Svantaggi

Administrative systems can be burdensome to overcome.

2,0
22 mar 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Safety culture, flexibility (although less and less over time). Good health insurance and 401k match

Svantaggi

Dow’s recent years illustrate the challenges of trying to simultaneously satisfy Wall Street’s demands for strong financial performance and aggressive DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) priorities. The company has heavily emphasized inclusion initiatives, including its openly gay CEO publicly sharing that coming out was one of the best days of his life in an internal communication, along with a notable increase in women appointed to senior leadership roles. Hiring practices reportedly require diverse candidate slates—including female candidates—and diverse interview panels before filling positions. These efforts, while well-intentioned, appear to have contributed to a series of questionable strategic decisions. Employees have borne the brunt through repeated rounds of layoffs (including significant cuts announced in recent years), minimal merit increases often in the 2-3% range, stalled promotions, and little turnover at the top levels of leadership. Senior executives seem insulated from the consequences, potentially overlooking how these factors—including their own leadership—may be central to the company’s ongoing struggles.

2
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto