Sinking ship - Recensione dipendente - Perfusionist presso Duke Health

1,0
17 mar 2022
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Still searching for PROs in this job.

Svantaggi

Duke Perfusion Department is a sinking ship and staff are getting off the boat fast! Duke Perfusion salary has been unable to compete for many years but during this critical time in the nation this department has proven they won’t be able to keep up. Staff are leaving at a rate of 2-3 per month and no one is accepting jobs (not even new grads). My advice: start your career elsewhere where leadership shows appreciation of perfusion through actions and not words. Staff have never left at a faster rate than with the current chief and this pattern will continue until the chief is dismissed. In addition to inadequate salary you must subtract the following from your take home pay: >$150/month parking ~$360 NC License Fee Continuing education is not guaranteed to be funded and only up to $1000!!! What a joke. $130/year Board Certification

Esplora altre recensioni su Duke Health

5,0
16 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Scheduling is quite flexible working 3 12s

Svantaggi

Holiday pay is only for major holidays not Christmas Eve

1,0
23 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The work is meaningful and the team consists of some highly skilled professionals who are dedicated to supporting patients, providers, and the organization. The role provides exposure to complex issues and opportunities for professional growth.

Svantaggi

The department suffers from significant leadership and culture challenges. Employees are hired as experienced professionals but are given little autonomy to perform the work they were hired to do. Leadership frequently inserts itself into routine matters, creating unnecessary delays and fostering a culture of micromanagement rather than trust. Communication is inconsistent and often lacks accountability. Important decisions and changes are frequently communicated verbally without written follow-up, creating confusion and shifting expectations. Employees are expected to remember evolving guidance, identify leadership mistakes, and compensate for communication failures. There is a noticeable gap between leadership messaging and employee experience. Work-life balance, employee engagement, and professional respect are regularly discussed, but many employees do not experience those values in practice. Concerns raised by employees do not appear to result in meaningful change, contributing to low morale and diminished trust in leadership. Leadership often responds to issues by implementing department-wide restrictions rather than addressing the specific individuals or situations involved. As a result, high-performing employees are subjected to increasing oversight and reduced autonomy because leadership is unwilling to address performance concerns directly. Turnover, employee dissatisfaction, and leadership credibility have been ongoing concerns. The department would benefit from leaders who are willing to listen, communicate transparently, accept accountability, and trust the expertise of the professionals they supervise.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto