Fine - Recensione dipendente - Assistant Manager presso Elanco

2,0
16 giu 2022
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Good staff Good people Good food Good place Good aura

Svantaggi

Bad hike Bad manager Bad mgt Bad work Bad system

avatar
Risposta di Elanco
3y
Thank you for sharing your perception. While we continue to remain focused on our vision “Food and Companionship Enriching Life, we understand that everyone's experience in the company is unique.

Esplora altre recensioni su Elanco

5,0
14 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Management listens to their emoloyees. Great benefits.

Svantaggi

Old equipment. Lots of forced ot for hourly employees

avatar
Risposta di Elanco
3w
We appreciate your positive feedback regarding management and benefits. At Elanco, we are dedicated to the wellbeing of our employees and are always looking for opportunities for improvement - we thank you for your feedback!
2,0
20 feb 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Plenty of great, passionate coworkers who work hard and collaborate. I had a lot of professional flexibility and my job was always interesting. Process teams on the manufacturing floor is a great system. Offsite resources, especially technical experts, are great.

Svantaggi

Expect to be firefighting constantly and frequently fighting against an aging facility and outdated processes. No unified vision or clear prioritization from management. Misalignment between site leadership and upper/off-site management created sustained operational friction and stress for employees. Leadership turnover was frequent, contributing to ongoing instability. Because of all this, there was a super low morale and a feeling of widespread fatigue. Inconsistent communication and decision-making standards contributed to a low-trust culture, including regular informal discussion of colleagues and unprofessional and sometimes intimidating behavior in meetings. Performance feedback and perceived value were highly dependent on shifting leadership dynamics rather than consistent, objective criteria. Employees could move from being strongly supported to heavily criticized with little change in actual performance. Although a nine-box review process was supposedly used, individual outcomes were not transparently shared with employees. Onboarding and training for specialized roles were underdeveloped. Compensation was just fine for workload and scope of responsibility.

1
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto