Wholly Dysfunctional - Recensione dipendente - Senior Consultant presso FICO

1,0
16 mar 2018
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Sharp co-workers; remote/flexible work opportunities; solid salary/compensation; decent Fidelity 401K retirement plans.

Svantaggi

Zero work-life balance, consistent 60+ hour weeks are not uncommon; required client overnight, holiday and weekend events happen frequently and time is not reimbursed/compensated; absent company culture, especially for remote workers; terrible medical/dental benefits; behind the curve with internal tools and technology; annual bonus payouts are touted during the interview process, but not guaranteed; Director/Executive level management is solely focused on client billing and dollars, and exhibit very little to no interest in their team member's best interests; transparency, trust and communications is lacking across internal cross-organizational teams; rewards/recognition for doing great work is non-existent; burn out will happen. In summary, I wouldn't recommend FICO as a career choice to my worst enemy.

Esplora altre recensioni su FICO

5,0
6 mar 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Salary, work life balance, people

Svantaggi

Nothing much to say, all good

4,0
24 gen 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

FICO is a great place to work as a software engineer. I had a very positive experience collaborating with smart, thoughtful teammates on technically interesting problems that have real-world impact at scale. The engineering culture values code quality, thoughtful design, and pragmatic decision-making over hype. Leadership was supportive, expectations were clear, and there was a strong emphasis on ownership and accountability. Overall, it’s an excellent environment for engineers who enjoy working on meaningful systems in a stable, well-run organization.

Svantaggi

Slower pace of change compared to startups or high-growth tech companies, which can feel restrictive if you prefer rapid experimentation. Legacy systems and tech debt in parts of the organization that require patience and careful refactoring. Process-heavy at times, with multiple reviews or approvals slowing delivery. Less emphasis on cutting-edge frameworks—the focus is more on stability and correctness than chasing the newest tools.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto