Conservative company - Recensione dipendente - Systems Engineer presso GEICO

3,0
8 lug 2008
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

If you are looking for something stable and doing the bear minimum of showing up on time and completing routing tasks then you can work for this company for ever whether rotating or posting out to different jobs within departments or regional offices. Pay scale is not even average however, with their yearly bonus profit-sharing plan, salaries come up close to average.

Svantaggi

Old school and old fashioned. Top managers and directors who have been with the company since they were teenagers drives the company in their own set ways. There is no proper planning in research and development and where techincal infrasture are heading. Managers and directors drive or dictates what systems are needed for their applications. As a result there are a number of products/software that are essentially doing the samething. Millions of dollars are recklessly spent acquiring duplicate software that is not useable and cannot be leveraged with any other application. Upward movement with Geico depends on either the individual is aggressive at searching for opportunity or simple you have to know the right person to network.

Esplora altre recensioni su GEICO

5,0
10 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

helpful team members and leadership beautiful facility with lunch room and gym very clean and organized systems

Svantaggi

hours I was originally offered as a new rep were not the best

2,0
12 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Organized in the hiring and training process

Svantaggi

They cared more about output and getting results than the understanding of all the knowledge they cram into us. In addition, we were in training/orientation with mostly supervisor candidates. Meaning, first, there were so many people that did things in vastly different ways which created confusion on expectations and overall objectives of the job. Secondly, it meant that those candidates were finding their footing and being evaluated just as harshly (if not more) than new hires, creating pressure that boiled over to almost every individual on a team.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto