Valuable exposure but management instability and limited coding - Recensione dipendente - Software Engineer presso General Motors (GM)

3,0
19 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

- Exposure to complex enterprise systems - Dev time is prioritized (reduced ceremony) - Supportive direct leadership/dev managers - Hybrid work schedule

Svantaggi

- Volatile senior leadership/execs (layoff hungry) - Limited coding assignments for juniors - Frequent platform and tooling migrations, not enough building & coding

Esplora altre recensioni su General Motors (GM)

5,0
25 mag 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

good salary good working environment

Svantaggi

no wfh,management a lttle bit bad

avatar
Risposta di General Motors (GM)
2w
Thank you for taking the time to write a review! We appreciate hearing about your personal experience and are glad to learn that you enjoy working at GM. Thank you for everything that you do!
3,0
6 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

GM offers above-average benefits compared with many employers, including solid healthcare, retirement, and time-off options. Compensation is generally competitive and aligned with market value, especially for engineering and technical roles. The hybrid work schedule at the Tech Center is a positive, offering better flexibility than fully onsite roles while still allowing collaboration with teams in person.

Svantaggi

GM’s current performance management culture can be a major morale killer. The stacked ranking approach and forced distribution create an environment where employees may feel they are competing against peers instead of being evaluated purely on performance. There also appears to be a cap on how many employees within a group can receive higher performance ratings. A manager may tell you throughout the year that you are exceeding expectations, but the final review can still come back as “meets expectations” because of calibration, quotas, or internal politics. Like many large corporations, it can be easy to feel like a small cog in a very large machine. Decision-making is often driven heavily by cost reduction, investor expectations, and headcount efficiency, sometimes at the expense of morale and long-term employee engagement. The “Workplace of Choice” messaging can feel disconnected from the actual employee experience, especially when performance ranking, headcount reduction, and workload expectations do not align with that message.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto