No longer a great place - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso Handshake

1,0
22 ott 2025
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Great benefits. Great location. Free food during lunch. Pay is not bad. Used to be a great place to work... most folks that were great have left or were suddenly laid off, but a couple are still there.

Svantaggi

C-Suite focusing heavily on AI, forcing implementation on teams without thinking about the downward effects, and constantly pushing unreasonable deadlines to improve hiring metrics that don't show the full picture. Director is a yes man to execs and doesn't think about team's workload or feedback... The blind willingness to follow whatever C-Suite wants has caused everyone to burn out and lose inspiration, while the director reaps all the rewards and gets all the pats on the back. Worst part is the Director will take credit for your ideas after you've tirelessly worked hard on it, whether it's a report you made or a new tool you built out and set up. He's done it multiple times. All of us on the team left the meeting feeling appalled the first time it happened, knowing who actually did the work. What was once a team-first environment has become a look-out-for-your-own work environment, where your management will throw you under the bus first instead of having your back... Also not really any room for growth or opportunities to learn. They just overwhelm you with work until you're all burnt out. You're basically just another number there and will be let go or replaced without a second thought.

Esplora altre recensioni su Handshake

5,0
24 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Remote opportunities for different projects.

Svantaggi

Projects often pause, and we wish they would last longer.

1,0
22 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Challenging, interesting position in the short term.

Svantaggi

The company has implemented a new timer policy that has “active” and “inactive” time on the backend that makes up for the total time. We were getting paid by total time (as you should), but HAI has changed it to only pay contributors for the time marked “active.” Time is “active” when scrolling, typing, and clicking within the specific task tab. Time is “inactive” when none of the previous actions are happening; i.e., when reading the task without moving the mouse or pressing keys, researching in another tab, etc. It sounds like they have changed the rules to only pay for active time, which has caused huge pay discrepancies. The percentage of inactive time is usually way more than active time on these timers due to the amount of reading, visual analyzing, thinking, and research required for some tasks. This behavior is unacceptable because time that seems “inactive” is still important to the quality and completion of tasks. They keep throwing accusations like “time thieves” around to justify it. If you respect yourself, pack it up and go somewhere else. I know most people who work at these places are desperate for income, but that’s exactly what they’re hoping for. They’re hoping you will be desperate enough to be taken advantage of.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto