Pay is below average for the industry/area. 401(k) benefits are not competitive. Unrealistically short project deadlines make it difficult to deliver a quality product or delve deeply into any particular topic. The company's business model prioritizes quantity over quality (e.g., I personally managed about 200 research projects a year). When I worked there, timelines had been streamlined in a way that made shorter project schedules feasible for researchers, but effectively increased workload on directors. It was also near-impossible for directors to schedule leave (expected to deliver projects when on leave). Senior managers pressured me to adjust performance reviews to benefit favored candidates. Would not recommend a supervisory position (Content Director or above) at this company unless it is your first short at management, in which case, consider having an exit plan after a year or two. I hope things have improved since I left the company.
