Good Culture But Leadership Needs More Direction - Recensione dipendente - Analyst presso Hatch

3,0
5 ott 2025
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

I found that most colleagues were genuinely passionate about the work being done and it’s a much more manageable pace for those coming from mainstream consulting firms. There’s a strong adherence to the company’s “manifesto” and core values that verges on corny at times.

Svantaggi

The company itself is trying to do too much at once and it has led to a lot of turnover and restructuring in the last few years. While it’s not Big 4 there are high expectations for productivity and billing to clients. Pay is often not in line with these expectations and the manifesto doesn’t pay bills. Benefits are also not competitive with other larger consulting firms. They didn’t even have a formal parental leave program until 2024. Employee development is very self directed as opposed to manager driven which could be beneficial to some but leads to very inconsistent leadership development and mentorship opportunities across the firm.

Esplora altre recensioni su Hatch

5,0
1 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

great work environment, very communicative and collaborative. Easy and open communication with PMs and upper leadership.

Svantaggi

need to be proactive to get work, especially if you're new. lot of travel, pro or con depending on your outlook.

1
3,0
18 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Exceptional project exposure across major U.S. transit, infrastructure, and energy pursuits — the portfolio and client roster are genuinely impressive and great for your professional brand The LTK Engineering Services acquisition brought in a strong, collaborative office culture that is noticeably more grounded and people-focused than the broader Hatch Ltd (Canadian entity) culture Strong brand recognition in the A/E/C space that opens doors with major public agencies

Svantaggi

Hired under the Client Action Team structure, which led to significant instability — multiple management changes in a short period with little transparency or consistency Overlapping time zones and regional boundaries create constant coordination friction; the flat hierarchy sounds good on paper but breaks down quickly when accountability is unclear and no one owns decisions Zero flexibility on in-office requirements — no hybrid accommodation even when the nature of the work doesn't require it Promotions are not merit-based. Advancement appears tied to visibility metrics like road safety observations and office attendance rather than the quality or impact of your work — deeply frustrating for high performers

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto