Services: Excessive Focus on Short Term, Killing Morale, Losing Talent - Recensione dipendente - Senior Managing Consultant presso IBM

1,0
23 mar 2011
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Top tier in image, and mind share in industry. Strong, respected brand name (based on inheritance of prior decades). So continues to be notable on a resume. Great (theoretical) potential for career based size and coverage. Pay is okay (not rock bottom, yet). Benefits are good (but are declining). Available online training is broad and mostly okay. Smart, talented people - team oriented

Svantaggi

Software is IBM’s main profit generator. Services (GBS) is waning in importance. Implication: Software gets the new investment, leaving fewer career opportunities in Services. Simple rule: Biggest cost for services is people, so either reduce people or reduce the cost of people. Implications for current / potential new employees: A. Long term focus to reduce US based headcount in favor of off shore or "landed" resources. Ask yourself why IBM will not publish its US population numbers anymore B. Extremely limited education and training (now nearly 100% on your own time, almost exclusively with online training) C. Downward pressure on pay. Maybe starting pay will be good (hires are treated better than current staff), but low increases/bonuses for top performers. Cheap college hires may not notice this until about five years when reality hits D. Benefits are a cost versus a attraction/retention of good talent. IBM has been at the "cutting edge" in the pension reform. E. If you are a professional hire, at a senior level, know that your tenure is short. It is unsustainable versus the low cost replacement headcount, especially when coupled with increasing performance bar (now, lower band levels are expected to do work that was once the responsibility of those one or two levels higher). College hires are now hired into lower band levels than in the past decade. Simple rule: Headcount x Utilization = Revenue. Implication: A. Vacation and work-life balance are almost meaningless. Every year utilization targets go up. Any earned vacation with years of service has to be “made up” to meet your targets. You also have to “make up” for bench time or take a performance hit. At higher bands you will be loaded up with signings, utilization targets, and manage people. The burden is not accounted for, so you will be working late evenings, weekends and your vacation time. For the ambitious one who gambles to take a run at top performer recognition – there is no life. B. There is no room for Education/Training unless you do it all on your own time and dime. C. Like a contractor, you are responsible for finding your next gig. IBM will not carry you for long. If you get a poor rating because of missed targets, you will be on the list for cuts. C. You are more on your own from a personnel point of view. Your manager has less time than ever. You cannot rely on your manager alone for a “fair” performance review. D. As a manager, you will have to choose between time spent on employees versus time on your targets versus time with your family. Executives will beat you up on all but your family. . Simple rule: Targets rule - they dictate behavior. Into the management and executive layers, it becomes apparent quickly that behavior is shaped by their measurements. This has the tendency to reduce the cooperation between divisions and between sectors within Services, and even managers within service areas. It is hard to articulate the magnitude of the impact of this without going into examples - impossible to do here. Cannot say that this is worse than other companies, but can say that it has become more of a problem of late. Implication: A. You will feel more like a number than a valued employee, since there is less room than ever to make long term commitments and career plans. Focus is on ute and signings, not your career. B. You will be positioned for more of the same in your next role. It will be rare to work on something truly "innovative". The safe road is the tried and true and no investment will be made without payback before the calendar year, if not quarter. C. You will have limited opportunity to move across sectors or divisions - impacts manager's/executive's headcount in the short term. D. You may be blindsided by the outfall of some squabble or issue between executives - keep an eye out and build multiple relationships (invest yet more of your time) is all you can do. E. Above all, look out for yourself, as nobody is going to look out for you - it takes too much time and there is no bonus tied to it. In fact, the shareholders are rewarding the current behavior.

Esplora altre recensioni su IBM

5,0
31 mar 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Very good team dynamic. A lot of exposure to various technologies.

Svantaggi

A lot of internal metrics and record keeping.

4,0
26 ago 2014
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Disclaimer: A lot of what I'm writing below of course depends on the work area and management chain. But I found this to be fairly pervasive policies in IBM in my 9+ years with the company. 1. IBM's policies and management are very flexible when it comes to working remotely or accommodating various life situations (sick days, doctor visits, etc.). Management is encouraged to measure an employee by their work and impact, and not by hours spent at their office. 2. Great colleagues! Though unfortunately, many have been leaving due to the instability of IBM's HW development business. 3. At least in my area, there's a high level of flexibility on which projects should I undertake based on my and my management assessment of business impact.

Svantaggi

1. Unfortunately, IBM still uses the "normal distribution" rating system, where at the end of the year each employee is ranked as a top contributor (5%), above average contributor (15%), average contributor (~75%), and bottom contributor (5%). This curve is difficult to apply in the R&D world, where you may have many members of the team working long and hard hours, and end up being "average contributors" at the end of the year, because there just isn't room for all to be top contributors. 2. The above may not be so disturbing, if only IBM didn't practically cancelled all raises, performance bonuses and incentive for the non top-performers. I've had a consistent "above average" rating in the last 4-5 years, and my raise and performance bonus were ridiculous mere 1.5-2% of my salary. Were I rated "average contributor" I would have gotten NOTHING. So you can imagine that people can go year after year without any raise to their salary. From talking to manager friend, this is IBM's way to eliminate the non-top-performers without having to fire them, as part of its direction of reducing US manpower. 3. Hiring freeze in many areas - again, as part of IBM's attempt to reduce its workforce across North America and Europe we see many jobs move to the India and Far East markets. This is of course upsetting to see local teams shrink and disappear, especially when many great local IBM colleagues and experts begin to drop out. From my experience thus far working with India SW teams - they are still very far away from the standards I would have expected from US and Europe based teams. 4. Poor top down communication about company's and divisions' future. Employees learn from rumors and news websites what's about to come...

636
avatar
Risposta di IBM
10y
Thanks for sharing your experience, and we're glad that you've had a positive experience working with talented colleagues and taking advantage of IBM's programs. IBM is in the midst of a major transformation, --our Systems business is going through its own changes to strengthen competitiveness. Change is never easy. As part of our transformation, we just launched a whole new approach for how we are coaching employees, delivering feedback and managing reviews. No distribution guidelines or what some think of as 'stacked rankings." What's particularly great is that this was co-designed with our employee base from all over the world... to the tune of hundreds of thousands of page views, comments, on-line debates and discussions. IBMers even named the new system Checkpoint, to reflect the regular feedback rituals we're adopting. Managers are more empowered with the new methodology to help them acknowledge the great work of their teams and help their employees develop professionally. These steps and more are showing up in our employee surveys as well. So IBMers are feeling the change. We are confident these changes will help us in continuing to attract and retain great talent.
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto