Vantaggi
There are zero pros to being employed by this company.
Svantaggi
What do you think should get people in the workplace promoted? People here get promoted based on the buddy system rather than performance, skills, knowledge, experience or years of service. People they hire and promote are not expirenced and won't ever get good experience here. Working here is poor experience for the employees due to the poor way things are done here. Good luck going from working here to working at a legitimate pharmaceutical manufacturing company. People that get promoted are the worst employees due to lack of attention by "leadership" and the poor culture. This company has poor leadership that doesn't actually pay any attention and just makes decisions based on ignorance. Most of these "leaders" clearly have never worked a real job a day of their lives, which is probably why they are such poor leaders and have no character or integrity. There are great workers with twenty years of great pharmaceutical manufacturing experience mopping floors in the warehouse here. I see production workers come here with a degree and 20 years of hands on experience from Eli Lilly thinking they are going to help their careers and move up here and they soon realize they made a mistake. You are not the kind of person they promote here. Those people have tons of experience and great resumes. They are stuck at the bottom here. There is a underlying bad culture especially with office workers and HR. Good employees are ignored and made to do all the work that bad employees are allowed to choose not to do. People in leadership roles here have zero integrity and they will expect you to have zero integrity as well or else you will be retaliated against. This company lies to their employees every step of the way including to get you into the door. They offer very little PTO and zero sick days. They have poor heath insurance. They have a terrible 401K match. There is zero employee performance data, just made up nonsense because actually paying attention is too hard and looking up who has done the most of everything is too much work and these "leaders" don't have the skills to see that information anyway because they never learned it. Co-Workers are lazy, slow and unwilling to learn or perform their entire role. After having been performing the tasks now associated with a newly created role, more than anyone in the history of the company, you still won't be "qualified" for that newly created role but anyone with any bachelor's degree with zero experience and from outside of the company will be qualified and will get the role over you. Amazing leadership decision there. They intentionally hire and promote inexperienced and spineless people for critical roles to be able to get away with doing things they shouldn't be doing. Some people can justify anything they do in their own minds but those are excuses for bad leadership. Everything you've seen and hated at the other pharmacutical companies is alive a well here too, thanks to the poor "leadership". The CEO tells everyone he was originally going to go into landscaping but decided to go into sterile injectable pharmaceutical manufacturing. Go look at the landscaping at this place. Skip this place and go straight to Eli Lilly or Novartis.