Used to be better but now it is just a horrible place - Recensione dipendente - Financial Analyst presso Infor

1,0
11 feb 2013
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Very few. The workforce is very good though many are leaving to pastures new. They pay on time and provide good medical health plan and pension scheme.

Svantaggi

No career progression. No salary reviews. Appraisals are done every 2 or 3 years and it is pretty much up to your manager. HR is a joke. They don't care and don't even make the effort to look like they do. IT are lazy gits that expect you to do their work. Management is appalling and they expect you to work as needed. No overtime is ever paid and no word of gratitude/recognition for one's work is ever said. You can easily be mediocre and you'll be fine. And you will be required to work Bank Holidays and Weekends with no extra pay.

Esplora altre recensioni su Infor

5,0
26 mar 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Not much volatility Work life balance Strong culture

Svantaggi

Big company, slow to change Heavy bureaucracy Nepotism

3,0
22 mag 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Svantaggi

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Risposta di Infor
3w
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto