Poor leadership, toxic political culture, no innovation, weak CEO - Recensione dipendente - Director presso Infor

1,0
4 ott 2019
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Nice headquarters and good sports sponsorships

Svantaggi

No strategy, constant terminations, CEO from finance with no clue about products or strategy, Pervasive incompetence and legacy thinking. Pathetic and petty environment

avatar
Risposta di Infor
6y
Although Kevin Samuelson is new to the CEO role, he has been a key member of the leadership team for most of his career. He brings both continuity and ingenuity to lead Infor in our next decade of growth and innovation, and we’re excited to move forward as a company with his plans for our future. We appreciate your candid feedback in this time of change for the business.

Esplora altre recensioni su Infor

5,0
27 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Good pay for area compared to other companies

Svantaggi

Some coworkers were low quality / low tier talent

avatar
Risposta di Infor
1w
Thank you for leaving a review. We strive to make Infor a great place to work for everyone, and to create an environment where employees can grow and thrive. We're happy to hear that your experience at Infor is a good one!
3,0
22 mag 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Svantaggi

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Risposta di Infor
1w
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto