Infor's Lack of Real Direction - Recensione dipendente - Maintenance and Support presso Infor

3,0
28 lug 2014
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Infor has a decent PTO program and health care benefits for the employee. Work from home opportunity is a great draw for certain positions.

Svantaggi

Infor has the lowest pay scale out of all the companies competing for the same workforce. The upper management is paid handsomely while the rest of the workforce is left fighting over commission, bonuses, pay raises. It is a company that will hold you over until the economy improves and the economy is now improved so there is a high turnover rate. Upper management just needs to stop looking at ways to meet their financial goals so they can go public and devote some of that energy into rewarding the employees. There are too many middle managers that fluff their work so they can get ahead and be rewarded for the little they do. If Infor is truly to compete with SAP, Oracle and the like, it needs to develop from within and provide a work environment similar to Microsoft, Google that keeps their best assets happy - their employees.

Esplora altre recensioni su Infor

5,0
31 ago 2025
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Good culture and work environment

Svantaggi

Low average salary compared to abroad offices

3,0
22 mag 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Svantaggi

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Risposta di Infor
2w
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto