What's a raise? - Recensione dipendente - Consultant presso Infor

2,0
21 lug 2025
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Good people work here, there is good work to be had, and there is the prospect of travel to interesting places to work with interesting clients.

Svantaggi

Pay increases are NOT A THING HERE because of Koch's policy of total compensation based on total contribution. The employee review system also doesn't really exist; rather, you're supposed to write your OWN job description (roles, responsibilities, and expectations) and brief it to your boss. The idea is it helps employees "self actualize", but in reality it makes you feel like you have to keep on arbitrarily raising the bar for yourself, and then again later, and again and again, even though your pay is not tracking with your increase in responsibilities. After enough of these RRE evaluations, it feels like you've essentially written the job expectations for someone paid double your salary, yet your salary is the same as it was years ago.

Esplora altre recensioni su Infor

5,0
5 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Great company to work for. Flexible. Great mentors and access to leadership.

Svantaggi

Leadership changes frequently Infor has a few "focus" industries - its best to be in one of those lines of business if you want to maximize sales compensation.

avatar
Risposta di Infor
3w
Thank you for your review. We’re delighted to hear about your positive experience with us.​ ​ We are the forefront of industry trends and emerging technologies, ensuring our people constantly have new opportunities to learn, grow, and accelerate their careers. ​
3,0
22 mag 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Svantaggi

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Risposta di Infor
2w
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto