Supportive Team, But Bad Salary, Less Oppurtunity to Learn - Recensione dipendente - Software QA Test Engineer presso Infosys

1,0
6 feb 2022
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

1. Good training (but domain for example SAP, Java Development, QA Testing etc assigned randomly to freshers, not based on the performance in training program) 2. Large team, oppurtunity to interact with many people. 3. Gives oppurtunities to freshers without considering their field of study

Svantaggi

1. Bad salary 2. Career progress very slow 3. Assigned into project at random

Esplora altre recensioni su Infosys

5,0
4 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Great salary, great people. LEX internal library is great.

Svantaggi

Can not think of any cons.

4,0
10 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Svantaggi

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto