Zero job security: Fired mid-shift by tech management while the CEO stays silent - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso Intergo Telecom

1,0
27 giu 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The immediate team members are incredibly supportive, hardworking, and do their best to keep operations running despite the chaotic environment. The core daily tasks offer decent learning opportunities for your resume.

Svantaggi

The company lacks basic professional ethics and handles staff exits with utter disrespect. The technical manager regularly blindsides employees by terminating them right in the middle of their shifts with zero prior warning or transition time. This creates a high-stress, paranoid environment where everyone is constantly walking on eggshells. Worse still is the complete lack of accountability from executive leadership. When these toxic management practices and unfair terminations were formally brought to the attention of the CEO, they chose to completely ignore the situation and refused to respond. Silence from the top down proves that this behavior is not just tolerated—it is enabled.

Esplora altre recensioni su Intergo Telecom

1,0
11 nov 2024
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The work environment there is quite flexible

Svantaggi

The company does not know how to manage developers

2
1,0
6 giu 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The company offers exposure to telecom technologies, SMS services, SMPP connectivity, routing, and incident management. The work itself can be challenging and provides opportunities to develop technical troubleshooting skills. Colleagues were generally supportive and knowledgeable.

Svantaggi

Job security was a major concern. Despite employees contributing significantly to daily operations, layoffs were handled in a way that left many team members feeling undervalued and uncertain about their future. Communication from management regarding organizational decisions was often limited, leaving employees to rely on rumors rather than clear updates. Management practices were also disappointing. In my experience, favoritism played a noticeable role in how certain employees were treated, recognized, and given opportunities. This created an environment where performance did not always appear to be the primary factor in career growth or decision-making. Such practices negatively affected team morale and trust in leadership. Workload expectations could be demanding at times, while employee recognition and long-term career development did not always receive the same level of attention. The lack of transparency and consistency made it difficult for employees to feel secure or motivated about their future within the company.

1
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto