employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

International Rescue Committee

Questa è la tua azienda?

Great NGO - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso International Rescue Committee

4,0
13 ott 2016
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

1. They serve actual people who are at their most vulnerable. That right there is a huge motivator. 2. They have a huge devotion - both in practice and financially - to home-grown technical solutions to solve their business problems. 3. People are helpful and express gratitude when you help them. I sat with an IT team and, unlike at many places, our expertise was visibly appreciated.

Svantaggi

Despite their deference to technology, it's very decentralized - understandably - and there are tons of redundancies, especially around program data collection. A lot of folks didn't really seem to grasp how much of a blocker a lack of standardization was on the progress on some of the very ambitious projects they wanted to accomplish. Additionally, despite an adherence to Agile software development methodology, they play fast and loose with deadlines for release, as there are often times too many cooks in the kitchen and requirements would sneak their way into the mix way after development started (I experienced major functionality requirements coming in during the LAST WEEK of development for my project).

Esplora altre recensioni su International Rescue Committee

5,0
24 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Very valuable insights in conducting work. Provides valuable input.

Svantaggi

None that I can think of.

2,0
22 apr 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

You will meet some amazing and passionate people here who are truly there for the mission. Many came to this country as refugees and immigrants themselves and continue to devote their lives to helping others going through similar experiences. If you end up on the right team, it's an extremely rewarding job.

Svantaggi

Unfortunately, the HQ upper management makes it a toxic place to work. VPs regularly undercut each other publicly (including at all-team meetings and gossiping negatively with staff), especially when potential job cuts were on the horizon. C-Suite didn't listen to staff concerns about upper management and didn't investigate major departures by dedicated staff who left due to poor management despite their dedication to the mission. Leaders picked favorites, ignoring work performance (excusing mediocre performance in some, having high standards for others), and preferred yes-men over staff who wanted to think more critically about the work. Projects were pushed too quickly, despite concerns that it could be detrimental to clients. Positions given to unqualified internal staff who wouldn't be interviewed for the role as external candidates. Senior leaders (director and above) are more focused on keeping their jobs than the mission and will use lower staff work for their own career growth/safety. DEI didn't seem to apply for senior leader roles, where there was little, if any, diversity.

4
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto