Very cool products, with lots of flexibility and mediocre pay - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso LOUD Audio

3,0
8 feb 2013
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Industry is fascinating to work in and the products are fun to work on Lots of flexibility with respect to hours, no culture of fear or 60 hour work weeks

Svantaggi

Pay is below grade, minimum to no chance for advancement.

Esplora altre recensioni su LOUD Audio

5,0
6 giu 2022
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Fun company to work for.

Svantaggi

Pays the minimum wage possible.

2,0
3 apr 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

You’ll learn to operate independently in a low-structure environment Some individual contributors are committed despite the challenges

Svantaggi

There is a persistent lack of clear direction or long-term strategy. Multiple CEO changes over time have contributed to inconsistent leadership and shifting priorities, with little transparency into where the company is headed. Even basic employer-brand elements—such as maintaining an up-to-date Glassdoor presence following rebranding—are overlooked, reflecting a broader lack of organizational alignment and attention to detail. The company hasn't been called "LOUD Audio" since 2018 and has officially rebranded to Mackie as of 2025. The CEO listed on Glassdoor is 3 CEOs out of date. Careers stagnate here. There are no defined growth paths—advancement typically only happens when someone leaves or when external hires are brought in above existing employees. In those cases, compensation is rarely adjusted to remain competitive. Accountability is inconsistent. Policies are enforced unevenly, which undermines leadership credibility. For example, employees are required to work in-office five days a week, while senior leadership (including HR and IT) does not meet that expectation. The elimination of work-from-home flexibility has added a meaningful burden without delivering clear benefits. In the absence of a strong in-office culture, collaboration model, or improved accountability, the policy feels performative rather than purposeful. The company tends to follow a “path of least resistance” approach. Systemic issues are avoided rather than addressed, and efforts to improve processes are often de-prioritized. As a result, unresolved problems accumulate and are pushed onto the employees doing the work, increasing workload without improving outcomes. Morale is low and the environment often feels disengaged. There is frequent internal friction and minimal collaboration, while larger operational challenges remain unaddressed. There is also little investment in tools, systems, or infrastructure. Inefficient processes persist, and requests for improvements—especially those that would benefit the customer experience—are rarely prioritized. While the company positions itself as customer-focused, that focus is not reflected in resource allocation.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto